Tag Archives: NASA

Could JADE HELM be “HAL 9000” operating on Earth?

In the science fiction film 2001 a Space Odyssey “HAL 9000” was an advanced computer that ran the technology systems (including life support) for the spaceship Discovery.  HAL independently determined that the astronauts were a problem and systematically murdered them. JADE HELM has all of the earmarks of HAL run amuck here on planet Earth and NASA has even referred to our planet as “SPACESHIP EARTH”!

08

Is this what you get when greedy rat bastard control freaks – with little or no personal understanding of computers – turn life on planet Earth over to an extremely advanced computer system, programmed to target humanity (“The Human Domain”) as the enemy?

Even world renown scientific genius Stephen Hawking warned in Dec 2014 that AI could mean the end of the human race. See: Stephen Hawking: AI could be the end of humanity

Is is possible that those who control the US economy would target “humanity” as the enemy? Not only is it possible, it is exactly what they have done. Here is a quote from Rockefeller’s infamous Club of Rome think-tank 1991 report The First Global Revolution:

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

Continue reading

Advertisements

Weather Weapons: the dark world of environmental warfare

[The following is extremely well researched and documented. This is information that all people across the planet should be aware of.  While the Club of Rome, the so-called ‘government’ and NASA are blaming the  ‘people’ for  “climate change”, the industrial military complex is covertly and intentionally creating climate devastation across the globe. Before you read the following, please note that: it was NASA that introduced the global warming theory.]

T.J. Coles (2010)

pdf version

droughts - floods

Didn’t it rain

Declassified records show that from 1949 to 1955, the Royal Air Force (RAF) released various substances, including dry ice, silver iodide, and salt into the atmosphere at high altitudes in order to induce rain. ‘The clouds would then precipitate, pulled down below freezing point by the extra weight of dense particles, thus making it rain sooner and heavier than it might have done’, the Guardian reported.1 Using chemicals supplied by ICI, ‘international scientists’ were involved in the experiments, including specialists from the Cranfield College of Aeronautics and the RAF’s meteorological research base at Farnborough. Perhaps the most significant aspect of the programme was that the weather weaponisation experiments continued three years after they had produced the worst recorded flood in British history, the Lynmouth disaster of 1952.

The Telegraph reported how “Former RAF servicemen….. described how they took part in the experiments in the years running up to the flood.” 2  Of Project Cumulus, or Operation Witch Doctor as it was nicknamed by Squadron Leader Len Otley, the BBC reported how the glider pilot Alan Yates sprayed chemicals over Bedfordshire, after which ‘Scientists told him it caused a heavy downpour in Staines, 50 miles (80 kilometres) away in Middlesex.’3 This claim appears to be disinformation because BBC radio reports confirm that the gliders were actually spraying over Lynmouth village itself.4

Concerning the seeding operations that caused the Lynmouth disaster, RAF Captain John Hart explained how, in 1952, ‘We flew straight through the top of the cloud, poured dry ice down into the cloud. We flew down to see if any rain came out of the cloud and it did, about 30 minutes later, and we all cheered…… [senior lecturer at Cranfield College of Aeronautics] Alan Yates said the BBC had been filming the experiments, but the resulting programme was abandoned when the country awoke to news of the Lynmouth flood the day before it was due to be broadcast.’5

Within a few hours of the cloud seeding operations, some 90 million tonnes of water fell onto Lynmouth, destroying hundreds of homes and businesses, and causing the deaths of 35 people. Reporting in 2001, ‘a BBC investigation has confirmed that secret experiments were causing heavy rainfall’, though the Ministry of Defence (MOD) denied any connection between the seeding experiments and the flood. Initially, the MoD even denied conducting any cloud seeding experiments at all. ‘Survivors tell how the air smelled of sulphur on the afternoon of the floods, and the rain fell so hard it hurt people’s faces’, the BBC reported. ‘Trees were uprooted and formed dams behind bridges, creating walls of water that carried huge boulders into the village, destroying shops, hotels and homes. Bodies washed out to sea were never found.’ The report quoted Tony Speller, a former North Devon MP, saying that when he asked for Ministry of Defence files, ‘I could never find anything of any consequence, except the fact that papers were clearly missing for the significant years [1949-55].’6

The BBC reported 34 deaths and the newspapers 35, and a decade later the BBC documentary Country Tracks (broadcast in 2011) confirmed that one corpse — perhaps a member of the secret services dispatched to monitor the operations — could not be accounted for. ‘[D]ocuments express concern by the [Ministry of Defence] over who would be financially liable if such rainmaking experiments went wrong’, the Telegraph reported, ending with a citation from a Ministry of Defence statement made in 2001 in light of the revelations: ‘Cloud seeding has rarely been successful anywhere in the world. Consequently the Met Office had not pursued this line of research for many years.’7 The MoD not only contradicted itself then, because its earlier statements denied involvement in any cloud seeding operations, but it contradicted itself in 2010 by announcing in a public document that out to 2040:

‘Weather modification will continue to be explored. The aims are to obtain more water, reduce hail damage, eliminate fog, or other similar practical result in response to a recognised need. Manipulation of the weather may affect changes in operating conditions, limit aviation flight envelopes, generate poor visibility while providing concealment and disrupt lines of communications. Weather modification may also affect morale.’

Returning home to see your house floating down the river is indeed bound to ‘affect morale.’

The MoD continued: ‘Analysis by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) has shown that, if successful, rainfall enhancement and hail suppression operations could have significant economic benefit. The WMO Atmospheric Research and Environment Programme notes that there are several operational programmes in fog dispersion, rain and snow enhancement, as well as hail suppression. (Emphases added).’8

Coupled with the Pentagon’s commitment to achieve Full Spectrum Dominance by 2020, the fact that the MoD and the US Air Force had the capability to destroy an entire village with 90 million tonnes of rainfall as far back as the 1950s, means we must take seriously the possibility that weather weaponisation is being used, under the cover of anthropogenic global warming (which is no doubt happening, but provides a perfect cover for freak weather events). The US Air Force 2025 think-tank stated in a long-term study that weather weaponisation ‘provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures.’ The US Air Force is counting on the fact that ‘some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification.’9

Continue reading

New NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere

NOW HOW DO WE STOP ALL OF THE NONSENSE THAT HAS BEEN ONGOING SINCE THE CORRUPT CLUB OF ROME’S REPORT IN 1992?

_______________________________________________________

New Discovery: NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere

Written by H. Schreuder & J. O’Sulliva, Principia Scientific International
March 26, 2013

nasa_logoA recent NASA report throws the space agency into conflict with its climatologists after new NASA measurements prove that carbon dioxide acts as a coolant in Earth’s atmosphere.

NASA’s Langley Research Center has collated data proving that “greenhouse gases” actually block up to 95 percent of harmful solar rays from reaching our planet, thus reducing the heating impact of the sun. The data was collected by Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry, (or SABER). SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances thought to be playing a key role in the energy balance of air above our planet’s surface.

NASA’s Langley Research Center instruments show that the thermosphere not only received a whopping 26 billion kilowatt hours of energy from the sun during a recent burst of solar activity, but that in the upper atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide molecules sent as much as 95% of that radiation straight back out into space.

The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet. However, this compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA’s chief climatologist, Dr James Hansen and his team over at NASA’s GISS.

Continue reading

NASA, global warming and Transhumanism

AL Whitney (C) copyright 2011 Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

IN 2001 NASA AND THEIR ‘CORPORATE PARTNERS’ PRESENTED THEIR PLANS FOR THE FUTURE OF MANKIND

NASA is responsible for promoting man-made global warming and the false reporting of global temperatures.

NASA’s assessment of ‘the value’ of human beings:

July 2001

NASA and its corporate partners are not friends of the people. It is very important that we all understand that. NASA – The Future of War (presented in 2001) is really grim. Our future depends on us understanding: who is looking out for our welfare and who is seeking to exploit and/or harm us.

Which part of climate change can be attributed to intentional weather modification? The public so far has had no oversight regarding these ‘programs’. Rosalind Peterson (very reliable source) exposed this 4 years ago:
Experimental Weather Modification Coming to Your Neighborhood, Soon (Nov, 2007)

What is it called when Congress passes legislation by stealth without informing the public? HAARP was ‘classified’ in 1987.  HAARP is an ionospheric heater. Did you know HAARP was approved just prior to the Club of Rome’s report in 1991 that proclaimed global warming is a real threat and blamed humanity (not corporations or the globalist’s WAR MACHINE) for it? The Club of Rome was founded by eugenicist Rockefeller. [1]

NASA is heavily engaged in the Transhumanism movement (as the Future of War presentation demonstrates) and in the Frankenscience creation of a ‘brave new world’.  Did you know about it, folks? But yet it is up and running and somehow being funded.  Some are calling it bioconvergence.

Continue reading