Tag Archives: global warming

US Physics Professor: Global Warming is the most successful pseudoscientifc fraud

I HAVE SEEN IN MY LONG LIFE!

James Delingpole, Telegraph.co.uk
October 9, 2010

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Here is his letter of resignation to Curtis G. Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society.

Anthony Watts describes it thus:

This is an important moment in science history. I would describe it as a letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenburg church door. It is worthy of repeating this letter in entirety on every blog that discusses science.

It’s so utterly damning that I’m going to run it in full without further comment. (H/T GWPF, Richard Brearley).

Dear Curt:
When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?

How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

Continue reading

Advertisements

Geoscientist explains ‘natural’ climate change

ERIC KARLSTROM EXPOSES THE STRUCTURE THAT WAS CREATED TO ADVANCE “CO2 CLIMATE CHANGE” – BEHIND THE GREEN CURTAIN!

by AL Whitney (C) copyright 2012
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and both the author and the AntiCorruption Society are acknowledged

From Operations Research Technical Manual “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars” (pg 6):  “All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?”

From NWO Plans Exposed by Insider – Falsified Scientific Research (pg 25): Somewhere in this connection, then, was the statement admitting that some scientific research data could be, and indeed has been, falsified in order to bring about desired results. Here he said, “People don’t ask the right questions. Some people are too trusting.”

Dr. Eric Karlstrom interview: Behind The Green Curtain                                                link→  RIR-120619.php
June 19, 2012, Red Ice Radio
From Colorado, Eric Karlstrom is a professor of geography at California State University. In addition to teaching physical and environmental geography courses (Geomorphology, Climatology, Introduction to Physical Geography, Human Ecology), he has also taught courses cross-listed with the Geology department (Geology/Geography of Soils, Physical and Environmental Geology), and an honors course (State of the World: The Environmental Perspective). Throughout his career, Dr. Karlstrom has continued his research program in field and laboratory analyses of soils and geomorphology as a means of reconstructing Quaternary paleoclimates.

In this fascinating interview researcher Dr Karlstrom takes us back to the 70s when The Club of Rome created the report Limits to Growth. He explains why that project was funded and by whom.  Very few environmentalists understand why environmentalism was created. Hint: it wasn’t to protect Nature from corporate exploitation!

Related

Anatomy of a Massive Con Job by John Truman Wolfe

New World Order Plans Exposed by Insider in 1969 [before the Club of Rome’s Limits to Growth]

What does peak oil, carbon dioxide, dollar devaluation and smart meters have in common?

Anatomy of a Massive Con Job!

by John Truman Wolf

[Editor comments: Mr Wolf does an excellent job explaining how this ‘environmental crisis machine’ was constructed. For those who think it wouldn’t be possible to buy off all so many players, follow the money!]

global warming-wolfe(Download as a pdf)

Con #1: LIMITS TO GROWTH

“In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.” —George Orwell

If you look with your understanding, the crimes against humanity are written across the rotting visages of Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Like a couple of aging prostitutes, these leading architects of twentieth-century evil still sell their wares to those with an insatiable lust for the power of the crown.

_______________________________________________________

Dr. Henry Kissinger (Rockefeller toady, globalist and Club of Rome member):

“Who controls the food supply controls the people;
who controls the energy can control whole continents;
who controls money can control the world.”

_______________________________________________________

THE CLUB OF ROME

Birth Mother of the Environmental Movement

The moldy twosome have something else in common. Both have been active members of an international think tank from the dark side of the force called the Club of Rome. Founded at the Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy, in 1968, some of the other fraternity brothers and sisters include Al Gore, David Rockefeller, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, and Mikhail Gorbachev.

And there is no one better to give you the short version of the Club’s agenda than Gorby himself:

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘internal disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.”

Who let this guy out of Lubyanka?

Their more precisely stated goal is population control. The solution? Create an environmental catastrophe like, oh, say, “global warming” and blame it on the planet’s most heinous villain—man himself.

But I should let them tell it:

“In searching for the new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. . . . But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for cause. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changing attitudes and behaviors that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

Sounds like a good plan . . . if you’re Darth Vader.

In 1972, the Club took the world stage with the publication of a book they had commissioned to be written by a group of MIT scientists. It was called The Limits to Growth. Examining the planet’s population growth in relation to available resources, the report concluded that the planet would run out of resources sometime in the next 100 years, resulting in a catastrophic decline in population and industrial production.

As one reviewer put it, the authors examine

“. . . the impact of humanity on the world ecology and of steps taken toward remediating the accelerating approach to a train wreck that is mankind’s ill-managed and uncontrolled ‘footprint’ on this planet’s environment.”

Still, these trends and their consequences could be altered, it argued; we had to be less, do less and have less. The brand for this Orwellian path to planetary salvation was sustainable development.

Heavily promoted, the book reached opinion leaders in political, scientific and economic circles as it exploded around the planet like the Harry Potter of environmentalism. It sold 12 million copies in thirty languages despite the fact that the research had all the scientific rigor of a plagiarized term paper for a freshman biology class.

“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.” —Mohandas Gandhi

Assailed by top scientists, the research was shoddy in the extreme. Population expert and author Professor Julian Simon said, “The Limits to Growth has been blasted as foolishness or fraud by almost every economist who has read it closely or reviewed it in print.

Yale economist Henry Wallich reviewed the book saying, “. . . the quantitative content of the model comes from the authors’ imagination, although they never reveal the equations that they used.”

Continue reading

International Panel on Climate Change lets mankind off the hook

THE GLOBAL WARMING POLICY FOUNDATION RESPONDS TO THE NEW IPCC REPORT

Natural Variability To Dominate Weather Events Over Coming 20-30 Years

By Dr David Whitehouse, Science Editor, Global Warming Policy Foundation

PRESS RELEASE

London:

Summer comes to the poles

For many decades to come, and probably longer, mankind’s influence on the frequency of extreme weather events will be insignificant.

According to a preliminary report released by the IPCC, there will be no detectable influence of mankind’s influence on the Earth’s weather systems for at least thirty years, and possibly not until the end of this century.

The Summary for Policymakers of the Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation , is in stark contrast to other statements made by the IPCC. It shows that mankind’s influence on the weather is far smaller than natural factors.

If and when mankind’s influence becomes apparent it may be just as likely to reduce the number of extreme weather events as increase them.

Surveying the state of scientific knowledge IPCC scientists say they cannot determine if mankind’s influence will result in more, or fewer, extreme weather events over the next thirty years or more.

The IPCC report says:

“Projected changes in climate extremes under different emissions scenarios generally do not strongly diverge in the coming two to three decades, but these signals are relatively small compared to natural climate variability over this time frame. Even the sign of projected changes in some climate extremes over this time frame is uncertain”

Continue reading

NASA, global warming and Transhumanism

AL Whitney (C) copyright 2011 Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

IN 2001 NASA AND THEIR ‘CORPORATE PARTNERS’ PRESENTED THEIR PLANS FOR THE FUTURE OF MANKIND

NASA is responsible for promoting man-made global warming and the false reporting of global temperatures.

NASA’s assessment of ‘the value’ of human beings:

July 2001

NASA and its corporate partners are not friends of the people. It is very important that we all understand that. NASA – The Future of War (presented in 2001) is really grim. Our future depends on us understanding: who is looking out for our welfare and who is seeking to exploit and/or harm us.

Which part of climate change can be attributed to intentional weather modification? The public so far has had no oversight regarding these ‘programs’. Rosalind Peterson (very reliable source) exposed this 4 years ago:
Experimental Weather Modification Coming to Your Neighborhood, Soon (Nov, 2007)

What is it called when Congress passes legislation by stealth without informing the public? HAARP was ‘classified’ in 1987.  HAARP is an ionospheric heater. Did you know HAARP was approved just prior to the Club of Rome’s report in 1991 that proclaimed global warming is a real threat and blamed humanity (not corporations or the globalist’s WAR MACHINE) for it? The Club of Rome was founded by eugenicist Rockefeller. [1]

NASA is heavily engaged in the Transhumanism movement (as the Future of War presentation demonstrates) and in the Frankenscience creation of a ‘brave new world’.  Did you know about it, folks? But yet it is up and running and somehow being funded.  Some are calling it bioconvergence.

Continue reading