Tag Archives: global warming

CO2 global warming is a blatant lie!

CO2 GLOBAL WARMING IS FAUX SCIENCE AND DR. DON EASTERBROOK DOES A BRILLIANT JOB EXPLAINING WHY!

Advertisements

‘Expert Consensus Reports’ are scientific mumbo jumbo!

THE “EXPERT CONSENSUS REPORT” TECHNIQUE IS TOUTED BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES!

by AL Whitney (C) copyround 2014
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

expert consensus report 2SO MUCH FOR THE EXPERTISE OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES.

To understand the significance of the National Academy of Science’s  admission, one  simply has to take a close look at the Delphi method of consensus – developed by the private RAND Corporation – and consider whose interests the RAND Corporation was created to serve.

The Delphi method
The Delphi method was developed by the RAND Corporation, the Robber Baron’s private think tank.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Delphi method is a structured communication technique, originally developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a panel of experts. [Item # 1] The experts answer questionnaires in two or more rounds. [Item 2] After each round, a facilitator provides an anonymous summary [Item #3] of the experts’ forecasts from the previous round as well as the reasons they provided for their judgments. Thus, experts are encouraged to revise their earlier answers in light of the replies of other members of their panel. [Item #4] It is believed that during this process the range of the answers will decrease and the group will converge towards the “correct” answer. Finally, the process is stopped after a pre-defined stop criterion (e.g. number of rounds, achievement of consensus, stability of results) and the mean or median scores of the final rounds determine the results. [Item #5]

Delphi is based on the principle that forecasts (or decisions) from a structured group of individuals [Item #6] are more accurate than those from unstructured groups. The technique can also be adapted for use in face-to-face meetings, and is then called mini-Delphi or Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE). Delphi has been widely used for business forecasting and has certain advantages over another structured forecasting approach, prediction markets.

Item #1

Who selects the panel of experts? By determining who is an “expert” and by cherry-picking those so-called experts, the final result can be easily rigged. Continue reading

CO2 cannot be proven to harm life on Earth!

IN FACT THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE ACCORDING TO MORE THAN 31,000 AMERICAN SCIENTISTS!!

The Global Warming

Petition Project

Click on image to visit web site

“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

Related

Carbon Dioxide is Good . . . Plants Need It!

Rising CO2 is Turning the World’s Deserts Green!

Insider admits that environmental orgs never reviewed CO2 global warming theory  [but accepted millions of dollars to promote it!]

Follow the ‘CO2 global warming’ money trail

Insider admits that environmental orgs NEVER REVIEWED CO2 GLOBAL WARMING THEORY!

BUT ACCEPTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO PROMOTE IT!

by AL Whitney (C) copyright 2013
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

peter taylor

Peter Taylor

Ecologist Peter Taylor has an impressive background regarding environmental protection. His expertise includes: ecology, biodiversity, renewable energy, and environmental policy analysis. He worked closely with Greenpeace in the early days of the organization and he helped implement the “precautionary principle” regarding regulatory planning in Europe.

Peter (like many others) had difficulty believing that rising CO2 was harming the planet. His previous experience with ‘computer modelers’ prompted him to investigate the so-called science behind the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) CO2 greenhouse gas theory.

To get a better sense of who Peter Taylor is, where his expertise lies, and more behind the scenes info, you can listen to the full interview: Peter Taylor Red Ice Radio interview of 2-13-10 (1 hr 15 min)

Peter Taylor also exposes the fact that the ‘panel members’ of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were ‘Delphied’! Here is a video of an event demonstrating how the Delphi process can be used to manipulate the participants, neutralize the  opposition and create a false “consensus”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuJcA8lH23E

Mr Taylor followed the money trail, analyzed the policies being implemented and discovered that the structure the “greens” unwittingly helped to build as a response to climate change, puts environmental protection into the hands of the banksters. Many others have come to the very same conclusion, including banker John Truman Wolfe. Mr Wolfe exposed the truth about carbon credits in his expose Anatomy of a Con Job – Con #5:

“I know you are going to be shocked when I tell you that the banksters have their teeth in the climate change agenda like a pit bull on crystal meth.

The solution? Pass laws that “disincentivize” the production of carbon dioxide by taxing its use. Oh, and turn the tax into derivatives so Goldman Sachs and friends can pig out. (See the chapter “The Goldman Connection” in my e-book Crisis by Design at http://www.behindthewizardscurtain.com.)

The marketing folks have branded this scheme ‘carbon credits'”.

When an extremely knowledgeable banker and an expert ecologist/policy analyst come to the very same conclusion about CO2 global warming and the bankers behind the curtain, it is time for all folks to stop accepting the ‘official’ story and look further into the global warming theory. From a truth seeker’s perspective, it always ‘pays’ to follow the money.

_______________________________________________________

More great and important interviews can be heard on Red Ice Creations out of Sweden

New NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere

NOW HOW DO WE STOP ALL OF THE NONSENSE THAT HAS BEEN ONGOING SINCE THE CORRUPT CLUB OF ROME’S REPORT IN 1992?

_______________________________________________________

New Discovery: NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere

Written by H. Schreuder & J. O’Sulliva, Principia Scientific International
March 26, 2013

nasa_logoA recent NASA report throws the space agency into conflict with its climatologists after new NASA measurements prove that carbon dioxide acts as a coolant in Earth’s atmosphere.

NASA’s Langley Research Center has collated data proving that “greenhouse gases” actually block up to 95 percent of harmful solar rays from reaching our planet, thus reducing the heating impact of the sun. The data was collected by Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry, (or SABER). SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances thought to be playing a key role in the energy balance of air above our planet’s surface.

NASA’s Langley Research Center instruments show that the thermosphere not only received a whopping 26 billion kilowatt hours of energy from the sun during a recent burst of solar activity, but that in the upper atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide molecules sent as much as 95% of that radiation straight back out into space.

The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet. However, this compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA’s chief climatologist, Dr James Hansen and his team over at NASA’s GISS.

Continue reading