Tag Archives: frank o’collins

Twelve Presumptions of the Court

judgeWHEN YOU WALK INTO A COURTROOM JUDGE’S JURISDICTION, AT LEAST TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS ARE ALREADY IN FORCE – WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT!

by AL Whitney (C) copyround 2014
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

Cannon Law researcher Frank O’Collins (one-heaven.org) ferreted out these presumptions and helped make them available to the general population. We cannot forget that our so-called ‘courts’ are run by a private guild by the name of the British Accreditation Regency.  See: The BAR Card.

From the book Fruit from a Poisonous Tree (page 58) by attorney Melvin Stamper, JD:
“The scheme also provided for the control of the courts via the 1913 creation of the American Bar Association, whose parent organization was the European International Bar Association, which was the creation of Rothschild. This allowed the International Bankers to control the practice of law, in that the only ones permitted to practice before the courts were those who were educated under their brand of law, which was only Admiralty and Contract law. Common law of the people was to be replaced as it gave the natural man many jurisdictional protections from the bankers’ legislation.”


THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT

Canon 3228

A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:

1.     The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and

2.     The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and

3.     The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of “public officials” who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and

4.     The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of “public officials” acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and

Continue reading

Advertisements

Frank O’Collins explains why OPPT is fraudulent

FOR THOSE FOLLOWING THE ONE PEOPLE’S PUBLIC TRUST STORY, THIS INFO IS IMPORTANT. THOSE WHO ARE NOT, WILL FIND IT UNIMPORTANT . . . AND THAT’S OK!

by AL Whitney (C) copyround 2013
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

FRANK OCOLLINSRecently researcher Frank O’Collins did a radio interview explaining Trusts in general as well as the more specific shortcomings of the One People’s Public Trust. Mr O’Collins has spent many years studying Cannon Law and the Roman Cult known as the Vatican.  Frank explains why the Catholic Church believes the Pope is Christ’s Vicar and that the Roman Cult is the proprietor/owner of all life on our planet. He has spent many years researching documents and has proof that the Catholic Church’s claim is based on fraud and deception.  During this process, Mr O’Collins has become an expert on the laws related to “Trusts”. His expert analysis of the One People’s Public Trust is summarized in the following audio clip:

Less than 5 min explanation of the “fraud” of the OPPT

For a more in depth analysis of trust law and the UCC: One hour audio of Frank O’Collins: Trusts and the OPPT (March 6, 2013)

Frank O’Collins web site: http://one-heaven.org/home.php

Related

Winston Shrout explains what the Uniform Commercial Code is and what the OPPT is not

OPPT promoter Lisa Harrison acknowledges the expertise of Frank O’Collins (Jan 2012)

One People’s Public Trust