Black’s Law 4th Edition – condition precedent:
” . . . it is a condition referring to a future event, upon the happening of which
the obligation becomes no longer binding upon the other party,
if he chooses to avail himself of the condition.”
It is first important to understand that The Real Law of the Land in America is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) – not the US Constitution/Bill of Rights. The UCC was implemented in all 50 states by the mid 1960s. Quote from UCC GENERAL PROVISIONS § 1-103: “The Uniform Commercial Code must be liberally construed and applied . . . to make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions.” Some call this new legal system statutory law; some call it law merchant; and others refer to it as contract law.
[Lawfully Yours TalkShoe call – explanation of the Notice of Condition Precedent:]
Each and every time we sign a registration form, application form, or contract it is presumed that we are knowingly signing a contractual agreement and that we are fully aware of all the terms and conditions and accept them, even though many times they are not disclosed. Common sense tells us that we cannot consent to terms and conditions of a contract that we are unaware of. However according to the current legal structure in place throughout the country, the presumption is that if we sign without noting our reservations, we are knowingly agreeing to all terms.
UCC Article 1, Section 1-206. Presumptions.
Whenever the Uniform Commercial Code creates a “presumption” with respect to a fact, or provides that a fact is “presumed,” the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact unless and until evidence is introduced that supports a finding of its nonexistence.
Here is a good example from a notice we received in the mail from our local bank in 2014 stating the new “terms and conditions” of our account contract.
“This document, along with any other documents we give you pertaining to your account(s), is a contract that establishes rules which control your account(s) with us. If you sign the signature card or open or continue to use the account, you agree to these rules.
This agreement is subject to applicable federal laws, the laws of the state of Ohio and other applicable rules such as the operating letters of the Federal Reserve Banks and payment processing system rules . . . The body of state and federal law that governs our relationship with you, however, is too large and complex to be reproduced here.”
So, by continuing to use our checking account it is presumed (see UCC § 1-206. Presumption) that we have agreed to a contract with “rules” that are admittedly not disclosed. All banks with corporate charters in America today are subject to the operating letters of the private Federal Reserve Banks because the money they use – FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES – is a private commercial scrip[i]. The vast majority of the population is completely in the dark regarding these so called rules.
Here is the glitch: because all governments and corporations use the private commercial scrip (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE) they are bound by the laws of contracts[ii], i.e. the Uniform Commercial Code. The UCC governs all commercial contracts. Enforceable contracts require “mutuality” i.e. both parties are aware of and agree to the terms and conditions. However, you cannot achieve mutuality without full disclosure. So, what the local bank did was coerced their customers into agreeing that non-disclosure is an acceptable term. They did this by threatening to discontinue the accounts of those that didn’t agree to their terms. Out of necessity most of their customers consented to the bastardized version of mutuality rather than close their accounts. As more and more people today receive their pay via direct deposit, not having a bank account would make it quite difficult for them to get access to the money they need to put a roof over their heads and food on their tables. This means that the customers accepted the non-disclosure terms either mistakenly or “under duress”. The fact that BAR attorneys write these entrapment contracts in a language that the majority of the population doesn’t understand should not surprise anyone and should enrage everyone.
In addition, when we visit web sites or accept the terms of Youtube, Google, FaceBook and others, it is also presumed that we are knowingly entering into a contractual relationship and understand and accept their terms and policies. Frequently we are requested to indicate our acceptance by clicking yes when a pop up box appears, but not always. Often there is a presumption in place that simply by visiting a web site to find out store hours or locations we are consenting to their privacy policies designed to assist them in data mining. Once you start looking at the terms you are agreeing to, you will clearly see that there is a really big problem with the notion of presumed consent when you go online.
To the best of our knowledge there is only one way to protect yourself from undisclosed terms and conditions and presumed consent in society today and that is to establish a condition precedent for your living flesh and blood self.
As the entire system of rules, regulations and policies only applies to legal juristic “persons” (see UCC § 1-201. General Definitions (27) “Person” . . . legal or commercial entity.), it is important you separate yourself from the “person” presumption. Here is a short audio clip of a courtroom debate between a living man and a Judge in Florida trying to get him to consent to being a legal “person” under the judges jurisdiction:
It is also important to note – as expressed in the banking example – that our money/banking system is defined by undisclosed federal laws and the letters of the private for-profit corporation known as the FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS. By the way, federal laws only apply to US CITIZENs. If you vote in federal elections you are a registered US CITIZEN. If you checked the US CITIZEN box when you opened your bank account or applied for a driver’s license, without restricting your signature, you have decided to define your legal character as a US CITIZEN.
So, once you understand what is really going on and that more often than not undisclosed conditions are generally NOT in your best interest, it is strongly recommended that you:
- Stop being a US corporation CITIZEN and voting for the government corporation’s[iii] trustees who don’t work for you anyway – cancel your voter’s registration.
- Implement a condition precedent notice to declare yourself a living flesh and blood man or woman (versus a legal fiction “person”).
- Restrict your signature by signing “Without Prejudice” (see UCC § 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights).
Black’s Law 4th Edition – condition precedent:
” . . . it is a condition referring to a future event, upon the happening of which the obligation becomes no longer binding upon the other party, if he chooses to avail himself of the condition.”
In other words, once you implement a legal notice (see UCC § 1-202. Notice; Knowledge) establishing your political and legal characters and sign your applications, registrations and contracts “without prejudice”, you can challenge the enforcement of onerous[iv] terms or conditions that either were not disclosed, were agreed to under duress, or only apply to legal juristic persons.
You can use the following example to create a Notice of Condition Precedent or write your own. This example was designed to define both your legal and political characters for the record. It also contains a statement for mothers and fathers to rebut the presumption that they voluntarily gave their son(s) or daughter(s) to the State, thereby placing them under the parental authority of the State (known as Parens Patriae.)
Option A) Have your notice placed in the legal notice section of your local paper for four weekends. Ask the paper to send you a notice after it has been filed with the court. If the paper does not file it, you must get proof of the notice from them and file it on the public record yourself. Use the four line address request in your notice as it takes you out of the UNITED STATES[v] federal jurisdiction.
Option B) You can also have your notice posted on the Condition Precedent web site for $25. This could help counter the presumption that you have agreed to the myriad of unintelligible terms and conditions associated with web sites or downloadable software or applications. You can view this site and the instructions here:
If you chose to have your Notice of Condition Precedent publicly posted on this site, the host will mail your notice to you directly after it has cured (been posted for 30 days), thus providing you with the documentation needed to start implementing it. Keep the original and send out copies as needed.
Get and keep copies and reference numbers for all notices.
Don’t forget to write “Without prejudice” above your signature each and every time you are called upon to sign anything . . . starting right now.
If an occasion arises whereas those seeking your signature deny you the right to clarify your acceptance via signing “without prejudice” above your signature, remind them that as they are using a private commercial scrip – the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE – they are obligated under the UCC rules of contracts and agreements Section 1-308 to permit this reservation of rights. Be polite but persistent. Per UCC § 1-305, “Remedies [such as reservation of rights are] to be Liberally Administered”.
NOTICE OF ‘CONDITION PRECEDENT’
In compliance with Executive Order 13132 (“Federalism”) signed by President Bill Clinton on August 10, 1999 Section 2:
“(d) The people of the States are free, subject only to restrictions in the Constitution itself or in constitutionally authorized Acts of Congress, to define the moral, political, and legal character of their lives.”
I hereby define my political and legal characters as follows:
Be it known by all, that I John Doe, as a living flesh and blood man that on this day of 23 in the month of January and the year 2016 do hereby give notice to all in the world that I am not a citizen of the United States Federal corporation. [See 28 U.S. Code Sec 3002] Any who wish to challenge this admission must do so by responding to this notice within 30 days of last publication. Notice is also given to any one in the world who may have a contract (or unsigned presumed contract) under the above name, living at the below address, that this notice serves as an addendum to all contracts or presumptions ab initio, in which the signatory name (or electronic signature) may appear. Notice that the following be included as part and above the signatory name: “without prejudice.”
Let it be known to all that this notice also serves to amend my son’s Certificate of Live Birth and rebut any presumption that the State has parental authority (parens patriae doctrine) over my son, Jimmy John Doe (date of birth: 5-7-09).
All return address or responses to be addressed as follows. Notice – all three line addresses will be returned to senders.
307 John’s Road
Akron, Ohio 
(united States of America)
The provisions, rules and orders that validate the Notice of Condition Precedent can be viewed on this page.
[i] Because the FEDERAL RESERVE is a privately owned institution, their scrip – the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE – is a privately owned scrip (currency).
[ii] See Clearfield Trust Company vs United States (1942); https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/clearfield-doctrine.pdf
[iv] Definition of onerous from Merriam Webster Dictionary: “having legal obligations that outweigh the advantages”