AND CALLS REAL SCIENTISTS PSEUDO SCIENTISTS AT THE SAME TIME
By AL Whitney © copyround 2017
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged.
Rhodes’ propagandist Dr Atul Gawande
To be a successful propagandist you have to combine enough truth to make people believe your lies. Dr. Atul Gawande did exactly that in 2016 in his commencement address to the graduating class at CALTECH. His propaganda piece also appeared in the June 2016 issue of the New Yorker titled The Mistrust of Science. While his credentials impressed the folks at CALTECH enough to get him an invitation to speak, they pale when you compare them to the credentials of Dr. John Ioannidis who thoroughly researched and proved that our collective mistrust in what is called ‘science’ today needs to increase, not decrease.
Here are a few quotes from Dr. Gawande’s propaganda piece:
But you also hope to accept that nothing is ever completely settled, that all knowledge is just probable knowledge. A contradictory piece of evidence can always emerge.
Many people continue to believe, for instance, despite massive evidence to the contrary, that childhood vaccines cause autism (they do not); that people are safer owning a gun (they are not); that genetically modified crops are harmful (on balance, they have been beneficial); that climate change is not happening (it is).
The sociologist Gordon Gauchat studied U.S. survey data from 1974 to 2010 and found some deeply alarming trends. Despite increasing education levels, the public’s trust in the scientific community has been decreasing. Continue reading
THE “GAME THEORY” ALLOWS PROGRAMMERS TO MAKE PREDICTIONS . . . EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN PROVEN TO BE FALSE!
By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and AntiCorruption Society.com is acknowledged.
The GAME THEORY – created by a paranoid schizophrenic – was built on a completely false premise and therefore will ultimately fail. The sooner this is exposed the better off humanity will be. The Game Theory relies on predictions made from computer analysis of numerical data. However, dead computers cannot accurately predict life because life is not static, it is dynamic and ever changing.
Life contains infinite possibilities and computers – no matter how sophisticated – cannot register all of these possibilities because a vast number of them are not dependent on “quantifiable” data. Important decisions and choices are made every day based on unquantifiable factors such as: love, joy, compassion, humor, grief, trauma, and personal commitment – in other words the essences of living men, women and children.
More on the history and fallacies of the Game Theory
THE “EXPERT CONSENSUS REPORT” TECHNIQUE IS TOUTED BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES!
by AL Whitney (C) copyround 2014
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged
SO MUCH FOR THE EXPERTISE OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES.
To understand the significance of the National Academy of Science’s admission, one simply has to take a close look at the Delphi method of consensus – developed by the private RAND Corporation – and consider whose interests the RAND Corporation was created to serve.
The Delphi method
The Delphi method was developed by the RAND Corporation, the Robber Baron’s private think tank.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Delphi method is a structured communication technique, originally developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a panel of experts. [Item # 1] The experts answer questionnaires in two or more rounds. [Item 2] After each round, a facilitator provides an anonymous summary [Item #3] of the experts’ forecasts from the previous round as well as the reasons they provided for their judgments. Thus, experts are encouraged to revise their earlier answers in light of the replies of other members of their panel. [Item #4] It is believed that during this process the range of the answers will decrease and the group will converge towards the “correct” answer. Finally, the process is stopped after a pre-defined stop criterion (e.g. number of rounds, achievement of consensus, stability of results) and the mean or median scores of the final rounds determine the results. [Item #5]
Delphi is based on the principle that forecasts (or decisions) from a structured group of individuals [Item #6] are more accurate than those from unstructured groups. The technique can also be adapted for use in face-to-face meetings, and is then called mini-Delphi or Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE). Delphi has been widely used for business forecasting and has certain advantages over another structured forecasting approach, prediction markets.
Who selects the panel of experts? By determining who is an “expert” and by cherry-picking those so-called experts, the final result can be easily rigged. Continue reading
The following excellent article describes what is wrong with our current medical industry. However, reporter Rappoport doesn’t go into the causes: 1) the FDA was NOT established to insure medications were safe and effective 2) the FDA and other government agencies are not branches of a legitimate government 3) saving lives is NOT the goal of the ‘elite’ Robber Barons who established both the AMA and the FDA – see video below 4) there has been a very well organized ongoing war against the American population since 1954
The Truth about the Rockefeller Drug Empire
The investigative research of retired neurosurgeon Dr Russell Blaylock, MD reveals when and how Rockefeller, and co. corrupted the field of medicine: How the globalists corrupted medicine
The medical cartel: too big to fail, too evil to expose
by Jon Rappoport, http://www.nomorefakenews.com
May 5, 2013
There are several reasons why the medical cartel is too big to fail: the enormous amount of money at stake; its aim to control populations.
In this article, I want to examine a related reason.
Suppose it was discovered that thousands of bridges around the US were in imminent danger of collapsing? Not because maintenance and repair were lacking, not because the materials used to build them were cheap and shoddy. But because the original designs were inadequate and broke basic rules of engineering.
Suppose five or six major manufacturers built their automobiles so the vast majority of power derived from the engines was transferred to one wheel?
Suppose the US Dept. of Agriculture recommended that all farmers spray their crops with heavy chlorine instead of water?
In other words, the science itself is fraudulent.