Category Archives: Environment

Climate shocker: Rising CO2 is turning the world’s deserts GREEN

ARID REGIONS BLOSSOM AS HUMANITY’S BENEFICIAL BURNING TAKES EFFECT

Lewis Page, The Register
July 11, 2013

Far from turning the Earth into a baking lifeless hell as had been thought, elevated levels of atmospheric CO2 are causing the deserts of the world to bloom with new green foliage.

CO2 greens deserts

That’s according to new research from government scientists in Australia, who’ve been scanning the planet’s formerly dry and lifeless regions using satellite imagery.

“We found a strong link between the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations and a greening that’s been observed across many of the world’s arid environments,” explains Dr Randall Donohue of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia’s national science agency.

According to Donohue and his colleagues’ research, climbing levels of CO2 in the air correlated with an 11 per cent increase in foliage cover from 1982 to 2010 across arid areas in Australia, North America, the Middle East and Africa.

“In Australia, our native vegetation is superbly adapted to surviving in arid environments and it consequently uses water very efficiently,” Dr Donohue says.

“This, along with the vast extents of arid landscapes, means Australia featured prominently in our results.”

Scientists had long speculated that rising carbon levels would make life easier for the green plants which keep us all alive by the sun-powered process of photosynthesis, in which they suck CO2 from the air, mix it with water to make sugar for themselves and throw away some of the oxygen (so permitting us animals to breathe).

“Our work was able to tease-out the CO2 fertilisation effect,” explains Donohue, saying he and his team adjusted their satellite data to account for other processes such as precipitation, air temperature, the amount of light, and land-use changes.

Donohue cautions that the greening of the deserts could have unforeseen side-effects – for instance there might be more wildfires, now that there are more leaves and plants in arid regions to dry out and burn during hot seasons. Certainly there has been much media coverage of wildfires in recent years.

Nonetheless, he says, “on the face of it, elevated CO2 boosting the foliage in dry country is good news”.

That would certainly seem to be true for those worried about a warming world. A powerful negative feedback of this sort would suggest that worries over positive-feedback runaway warming – of the sort which underlies the more negative climate forecasts – is much less likely than had been thought.

Donohue and his colleagues’ research has been published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, and was flagged up by CSIRO here.

Advertisements

Insider admits that environmental orgs NEVER REVIEWED CO2 GLOBAL WARMING THEORY!

BUT ACCEPTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO PROMOTE IT!

by AL Whitney (C) copyright 2013
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

peter taylor

Peter Taylor

Ecologist Peter Taylor has an impressive background regarding environmental protection. His expertise includes: ecology, biodiversity, renewable energy, and environmental policy analysis. He worked closely with Greenpeace in the early days of the organization and he helped implement the “precautionary principle” regarding regulatory planning in Europe.

Peter (like many others) had difficulty believing that rising CO2 was harming the planet. His previous experience with ‘computer modelers’ prompted him to investigate the so-called science behind the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) CO2 greenhouse gas theory.

To get a better sense of who Peter Taylor is, where his expertise lies, and more behind the scenes info, you can listen to the full interview: Peter Taylor Red Ice Radio interview of 2-13-10 (1 hr 15 min)

Peter Taylor also exposes the fact that the ‘panel members’ of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were ‘Delphied’! Here is a video of an event demonstrating how the Delphi process can be used to manipulate the participants, neutralize the  opposition and create a false “consensus”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuJcA8lH23E

Mr Taylor followed the money trail, analyzed the policies being implemented and discovered that the structure the “greens” unwittingly helped to build as a response to climate change, puts environmental protection into the hands of the banksters. Many others have come to the very same conclusion, including banker John Truman Wolfe. Mr Wolfe exposed the truth about carbon credits in his expose Anatomy of a Con Job – Con #5:

“I know you are going to be shocked when I tell you that the banksters have their teeth in the climate change agenda like a pit bull on crystal meth.

The solution? Pass laws that “disincentivize” the production of carbon dioxide by taxing its use. Oh, and turn the tax into derivatives so Goldman Sachs and friends can pig out. (See the chapter “The Goldman Connection” in my e-book Crisis by Design at http://www.behindthewizardscurtain.com.)

The marketing folks have branded this scheme ‘carbon credits'”.

When an extremely knowledgeable banker and an expert ecologist/policy analyst come to the very same conclusion about CO2 global warming and the bankers behind the curtain, it is time for all folks to stop accepting the ‘official’ story and look further into the global warming theory. From a truth seeker’s perspective, it always ‘pays’ to follow the money.

_______________________________________________________

More great and important interviews can be heard on Red Ice Creations out of Sweden

New NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere

NOW HOW DO WE STOP ALL OF THE NONSENSE THAT HAS BEEN ONGOING SINCE THE CORRUPT CLUB OF ROME’S REPORT IN 1992?

_______________________________________________________

New Discovery: NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere

Written by H. Schreuder & J. O’Sulliva, Principia Scientific International
March 26, 2013

nasa_logoA recent NASA report throws the space agency into conflict with its climatologists after new NASA measurements prove that carbon dioxide acts as a coolant in Earth’s atmosphere.

NASA’s Langley Research Center has collated data proving that “greenhouse gases” actually block up to 95 percent of harmful solar rays from reaching our planet, thus reducing the heating impact of the sun. The data was collected by Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry, (or SABER). SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances thought to be playing a key role in the energy balance of air above our planet’s surface.

NASA’s Langley Research Center instruments show that the thermosphere not only received a whopping 26 billion kilowatt hours of energy from the sun during a recent burst of solar activity, but that in the upper atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide molecules sent as much as 95% of that radiation straight back out into space.

The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet. However, this compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA’s chief climatologist, Dr James Hansen and his team over at NASA’s GISS.

Continue reading

Third World status comes to U.S. Communities

WHERE IS THE EPA? WHERE ARE THE ENVIRONMENTAL NON-PROFITS? WHERE IS THE LOCAL SHERIFF?

by AL Whitney (C) copyright 2012
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and both the author and the AntiCorruption Society are acknowledged

The story of what is happening in Butler County Pennsylvania is a very tragic example of the ongoing conflict between the dead-legal fiction, known as The Corporation, and the natural world, to include the people.

As for the petroleum industry, devastating the population and the environment has been ongoing since the Rockefeller cartel was established. The following from PSYWAR explains how the ruthless Rockefellers have managed to keep the public at bay and how they got their tentacles into so many facets of our society!

Related

The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen

Review:

Gary Allen’s book ” The Rockefeller File” reveals documented facts of power, influence, market manipulation through monopolies, all behind a cloak of secrecy, never revealing its true face. One of the most influential and wealthiest families in the United States uses all levers to their disposal to influence public policy in the USA, to further their causes, which are firstly financial, but secondly, and with more lasting effect, acquisition of power by influencing every administration from the days of John D. Rockefeller to this day. Gary Allen is a serious author of historic non-fiction, brilliantly documented analysis of controversial subjects, mostly unnoticed by the general public, but of great and grave consequences for them. “The Rockefeller File” reveals a seeming paradox, that one of the richest families in the world supports communism, the avowed enemy, and not only promotes it but supports its march to prominence with huge amounts of money, and is to this day a promoter and financier of the creation of a One World Government under the United Nations. Americans are duped to think of the Rockefeller family as patriotic, generous, noble, living their wealth in the true American Dream way. Little do they know of the truth behind the mask, unscrupulous manipulation of public policy through family trusts and foundations, never subject to one cent of income taxes, amassing huge shares of assets in global corporations on the backs of average American citizen. The goal of this volume is to open our eyes to the destructive trend, in which we are sliding ever deeper to a miserable future for us and our children, culminating in a One World Government with an upper crust of “Have Alls” lording over a population of slaves under a godless socialist banner. We are called to action, to stop this from progression to that end.

Anatomy of a Massive Con Job!

by John Truman Wolf

[Editor comments: Mr Wolf does an excellent job explaining how this ‘environmental crisis machine’ was constructed. For those who think it wouldn’t be possible to buy off all so many players, follow the money!]

global warming-wolfe(Download as a pdf)

Con #1: LIMITS TO GROWTH

“In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.” —George Orwell

If you look with your understanding, the crimes against humanity are written across the rotting visages of Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Like a couple of aging prostitutes, these leading architects of twentieth-century evil still sell their wares to those with an insatiable lust for the power of the crown.

_______________________________________________________

Dr. Henry Kissinger (Rockefeller toady, globalist and Club of Rome member):

“Who controls the food supply controls the people;
who controls the energy can control whole continents;
who controls money can control the world.”

_______________________________________________________

THE CLUB OF ROME

Birth Mother of the Environmental Movement

The moldy twosome have something else in common. Both have been active members of an international think tank from the dark side of the force called the Club of Rome. Founded at the Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy, in 1968, some of the other fraternity brothers and sisters include Al Gore, David Rockefeller, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, and Mikhail Gorbachev.

And there is no one better to give you the short version of the Club’s agenda than Gorby himself:

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘internal disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.”

Who let this guy out of Lubyanka?

Their more precisely stated goal is population control. The solution? Create an environmental catastrophe like, oh, say, “global warming” and blame it on the planet’s most heinous villain—man himself.

But I should let them tell it:

“In searching for the new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. . . . But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for cause. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changing attitudes and behaviors that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

Sounds like a good plan . . . if you’re Darth Vader.

In 1972, the Club took the world stage with the publication of a book they had commissioned to be written by a group of MIT scientists. It was called The Limits to Growth. Examining the planet’s population growth in relation to available resources, the report concluded that the planet would run out of resources sometime in the next 100 years, resulting in a catastrophic decline in population and industrial production.

As one reviewer put it, the authors examine

“. . . the impact of humanity on the world ecology and of steps taken toward remediating the accelerating approach to a train wreck that is mankind’s ill-managed and uncontrolled ‘footprint’ on this planet’s environment.”

Still, these trends and their consequences could be altered, it argued; we had to be less, do less and have less. The brand for this Orwellian path to planetary salvation was sustainable development.

Heavily promoted, the book reached opinion leaders in political, scientific and economic circles as it exploded around the planet like the Harry Potter of environmentalism. It sold 12 million copies in thirty languages despite the fact that the research had all the scientific rigor of a plagiarized term paper for a freshman biology class.

“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.” —Mohandas Gandhi

Assailed by top scientists, the research was shoddy in the extreme. Population expert and author Professor Julian Simon said, “The Limits to Growth has been blasted as foolishness or fraud by almost every economist who has read it closely or reviewed it in print.

Yale economist Henry Wallich reviewed the book saying, “. . . the quantitative content of the model comes from the authors’ imagination, although they never reveal the equations that they used.”

Continue reading