Con #2: Oil is Not a Fossil Fuel – It is ‘Renewable’

The following is from John Truman Wolfe’s e-book, The Anatomy of a Con Job
Permission to circulate this work has been granted by the author
PDF version is available here

_____________________________________________________

by John Truman Wolfe

global warming-wolfeThe immigration officer at Sheremetyevo took my passport and studied it for some time. He didn’t say anything; he just thumbed through the passport and then looked at a computer screen for a couple of lifetimes before stamping it and grunting me on to customs.

The KGB was still manning the borders the first time I went to Moscow shortly after the fall of Communism. Letting Americans walk freely into Mother Russia without official surveillance was driving the man crazy but he had to keep a lid on it.

In fact, Communism had been officially dead for only a few months when the shock troops of capitalism started storming the gates of opportunity in the former Soviet Union. The ghosts of Marx, Lenin and Stalin stalked the halls of the Politburo in horror as entrepreneurs from the United States, Japan and Western Europe tried to cut deals for every asset in Mother Russia that wasn’t nailed down. Banking, hospitality, timber and precious metals came under assault by peculiar partnerships of western capitalists and thugs from the once mighty KGB. During those early years, when Yeltsin (God love him) and his vodka were in office, it was a free-for-all.

The Oklahoma land rush of the 1890s had nothing on Moscow in 1992.

But even then, the oil industry stayed under control of the state—directly or indirectly. In fact, as recently as 2003, the bare-chested former KGB colonel and current premier—soon to be president of Russia . . . again—Vladimir Putin squashed a buyout deal between Russia’s Yukos and Exxon, the largest company in the world.

To understand the reason for this, we return momentarily to the early days of the Cold War when an isolated Soviet Union tasked their top scientists to identify the actual source of oil. Not a weekend homework assignment. After considerable research, in 1956, Russian scientist Professor Vladimir Porfir’yev announced that “crude oil and natural petroleum gas have no intrinsic connection with biological matter originating near the surface of the earth. They are primordial [originating with the earth’s formation] materials which have been erupted from great depths.”

If your eyeballs didn’t fall out when you read that, you might want to read it again.

He said oil doesn’t come from anything biologic, not, as conventional wisdom dictates, from the fossilized remains of dinosaurs and/or ancient plant matter. It comes from very deep in the earth and is created by a biochemical reaction that subjected hydrocarbons (elements having carbon and hydrogen) to extreme heat and intense pressure during the earth’s formation.

Russians referred to this oil (any oil, really) as “abiotic oil” because it is not created from the decomposition of biological life forms, but rather from the chemical process continually occurring inside the earth.

I know, easy for Porfir’yev to say. But it turns out it was more than just a theory.

Because shortly after the Russians discovered this, they started drilling ultra-deep wells and finding oil at 30,000 and 40,000 feet below the earth’s surface. These are staggering depths, and far below the depth at which organic matter can be found, which is 18,000 feet.

Interesting, eh?

The Russians applied their theory of abiotic deep-drilling technology to the Dnieper-Donets Basin, an area understood for the previous half a century to be barren of oil. Of sixty wells drilled there using abiotic technology, thirty-seven became commercially productive—a 62 percent success rate compared with the roughly 10 percent success rate of a U.S. wildcat driller. The oil found in the basin rivaled Alaska’s North Slope.

Let’s say they had a good hair day.

But it doesn’t stop there, not by a long shot. Since their earlier discoveries, the major Russian oil companies have quietly drilled more than 310 ultra-deep wells and put them into production.

Result? Russia recently overtook Saudi Arabia as the planet’s largest oil producer.

Maybe they are onto something.

Though there were papers written on this early on, almost all were in Russian and few made it to the West. And those that did were laughed at.

No more. With Russia’s rejection of the Exxon-Yukos deal (Putin did not want this technology and their abiotic oil experts exported to the West) and the access to information now available on the Internet, the word has begun to spread rapidly to the West. Still, it hasn’t taken hold yet.

Why not? This is huge. Oil is not a fossil fuel! And it’s renewable! Wow!

There are a couple of factors at play here.

Big oil has a vested interest in pushing the idea that oil is scarce, hard to find, and thus costly to produce—all of which, of course, means increased revenues and profits. This is a story in itself, but not the primary focus here.

More relevant to our story is the fact that a cornerstone of the environmental movement is this: oil is a fossil fuel, a fossil fuel that is scarce, and is in limited and ever decreasing supply. Moreover, its production creates carbon dioxide. Therefore its use, for virtually all productive purposes—agricultural production, real estate construction, auto, truck, train and air transportation, utilities, heating, cooling, communication, ad infinitum (all of them)—must be curtailed.

According to the thirty-year update of the book The Limits to Growth,

“A prime example of a nonrenewable resource is fossil fuels, whose limits should be obvious, although many people, including distinguished economists, are in denial over the elementary fact. More than 80 percent of year 2000 commercial energy use comes from nonrenewable fossil fuels—oil, natural gas, and coal. The underground stocks of fossil fuels are going continuously and inexorably down. . . .

“Peak gas production will certainly occur in the next 50 years, the peak for oil production will occur much sooner, probably within the decade.”

Scary stuff. Frightening. But as false as a hooker’s smile.

Oil is not a fossil fuel.

And it is “renewable.”

While I have never been a fan of Putin the Macho, the Russians have demonstrcted the accuracy of their theory in the only place it counts—the oil field. Oil is not only abiotic, it continues to populate fields that were understood to be as dry of petroleum as a desert wind. In fact, some scientists believe it is the centrifugal force of the planet’s rotation that forces abiotic oil toward the planet’s surface on a continuous basis.

“There are some things the general public does not need to know, and shouldn’t. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows.” —the late Katherine Graham, owner of the Washington Post

So Con #2 is that oil is a fossil fuel (which it isn’t), that it is scarce and being depleted (which it isn’t), that it is nonrenewable (which it isn’t), and that, as a result, catastrophe looms (which it doesn’t) unless we drastically curtail our use of petroleum.

Lies one and all, which lead us to the granddaddy of con—Con #3: Global Warming – Climate Change

[Related: Overwhelming Preponderance of Geological Evidence; 18 min interview on the origins of oil]

Full article can be viewed here

Advertisements

21 responses to “Con #2: Oil is Not a Fossil Fuel – It is ‘Renewable’

  1. I read about this many years ago. I believe it was a scientist from the USA that had a book stating the same points that is written here. I too, never believed O&G came from dinosaurs, sea life forms or plants, just didn’t fit in my clinical brain.
    I would like to point out in the text above there is a mistake in the last paragraph above, which is “nonrenewable (which it isn’t)” should read “(which it is)” .

    • How do you figure? The article states that oil is indeed renewable. That means it isn’t nonrenewable. Isn’t nonrenewable means renewable. If he had said that it *IS* nonrenewable (as you suggest), that would mean that it isn’t renewable.

  2. Pingback: Fluoridation Australia | FCC-22nd Nov

  3. Pingback: Fluoridation Australia | FCC-25th Nov

  4. Pingback: Fluoridation Australia | FCC-1st Dec

  5. Pingback: Fluoridation Queensland | Climate Change, Fluoride Gases and ‘Clean Power’

  6. I was interested in finding out how petroleum was determined to be a fossil fuel. My search lead me to this. I’m not above allowing an alternate unproven theory for the black substance.

  7. Pingback: Fluoridation Australia | CLIMATE CHANGE AND FLUORIDE GASES + New clean safe alternatives.

  8. Thomas Gold was one of “our” guys who also believed in Abiotic Oil.

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Deep-Hot-Biosphere-Fossil/dp/0387985468

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Goldhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Goldhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Gold

    Eugene Island in the Gulf of Mexico refills itself.

    Gull Island in Alaska has a huge deposit of deep oil, and is capped.

    The oil runs out of the ground there it is said.

    The Con does make sense if you are them, huh? Like Debeers diamonds locked up, there are plenty!

    PS, keep digging, good site, and quit nitpicking on Anna Von Reitz, she is close enough. Reach out and help her.

    The NLA is misguided by their leader thus far, but the folks are good people. Reach out to them too.

    Their Monday night call used to let you text during the call, or call in. – Divided we fall.

    Share and pass the word.

    PS) I like this blog for the psychological aspect of dealing with this and related issues…of deceit.
    http://omnithought.org/start-here

  9. The idea that oil is not a fossil fuel is new to me but I can accept that possibility . How you can know that it’s renewable ? That assertion seems speculative .

  10. Pingback: Oil Is Not A Fossil Fuel |

  11. Pingback: Oil is not a fossil fuel… | Hutts Green Planet

  12. Great article!

  13. And here is some real science on it:

  14. Extremely interesting. For years is suspected that oil is not fossil fuel. It just never made sense to me that there would be that many fossils in the history of earth to create trillions and trillions of barrels of oil. Unless I missed it, I don’t see that this article mentions how oil is reusable. When it’s burned it goes from a solid to a gas. How is it reusable?

    • Oil is renewable, not reusable.

    • He’s saying that oil is continuously regenerated based on planetary geologic processes (mineral, not biological). Further, the article states that the only limiting factor in the amount of oil is the amount of constituent mineral materials which make up the planet. Hence, it isn’t that there is a set about of oil because x amount of dinosaurs and plants decomposed into oil and once it’s used it’s gone. But rather, oil is generated by the planet itself at some specific rate (determined by the constituent mineral makeup of this particular planet, etc.) and as long as we do not consume the oil at a rate which exceeds that rate of generation (probably impossible, given the size of the planet), the oil supply would be effectively infinite (for our purposes anyway).

  15. Pingback: Pope Francis Takes on Banksters 06.15 Encyclical | OUR GREATER DESTINY

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s