Will the man-made global warming myth be our undoing?

AL Whitney (C) copyright 2011 Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

THOSE ‘PUSHING THE MYTH’ ARE ALSO TRYING TO SELL THE PEOPLE OF THE PLANET ON DEADLY NUCLEAR ENERGY . . . OR IS IT THE OTHER WAY AROUND?

The facts about last year’s Climate-gate have been obscured by the paid promoters (and there are many) of the man-made global warming myth – also known as Anthropomorphic Global Warming (AGW).  The Climate-gate emails that were leaked last year exposed scientific fraud in its most egregious form.

Yet Climate-gate is no longer in the news and the perpetration of AGW marches on. Worse yet, some of the fraud promoters like ‘environmentalist’ author George Monbiot are pushing nuclear power as a solution. He has taken the position that the only way for mankind to survive the (non-existent) threat of AGW is to pursue the known deadly threat of nuclear power with its toxic byproducts/emissions. [1]

From Seven Double Standards by George Monbiot [2]
Mar 31, 2011
I did not claim that there is no alternative to atomic energy, or any such thing. Nor did I suggest that it should replace renewables, or produce any higher proportion of our electricity than it does already. But I did point out that most of the countries that might abandon nuclear power are likely to replace it not with renewables but with fossil fuel, and that this is a major change for the worse. Mark Lynas has shown how phasing out planned nuclear programmes in a number of countries as a result of the Fukushima disaster could add another degree to global warming. Chris Goodall estimates that if the planned construction of new nuclear power stations in the UK stalls in response to the crisis, the result will be an increase of 9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide for every year we delay.

Now is the time for all “real” critical thinking environmentalists to take a long hard look at the man-made global warming myth (as I did several years ago) and stop supporting/promoting fraudulent science. [3] If the environmental organization that you have belonged to for many years refuses to change their position, cancel your membership and let them know why.

The stakes are very high. In fact the ‘cure’ that is being proposed (nuclear power) is much more of a threat to all living creatures on the planet than the ‘disease’ (AGW) – which isn’t even real.  

The only reason we don’t have huge non-polluting solar farms in the desert is that the solar industry doesn’t have the money to bribe politicians for subsidies. It is all about big energy corporations and their clout with policy makers. It has absolutely nothing to do with carbon dioxide or clean energy. The globalists want to control energy and to do that they have to control fuel. And they can’t put a meter on the sun!

Environmental reporter Yoichi Shimatsu explains ‘green energy’ politics/funding on Rense Radio:  4 min audio clip

Frederick C. Howe in his book Confessions of a Monopolist talks about government funding:
“These are the rules of big business. They have superseded the teachings of our parents and are reducible to a simple maxim: Get a monopoly; let Society work for you; and remember that the best of all business is politics, for a legislative grant, franchise, subsidy or tax exemption is worth more than a Kimberly or Comstock lode, since it does not require any labor, either mental or physical, for its exploitation.” 

________________________________________________________________

[1] Global Implications of Sellafield by radiation expert Leuren Moret

[2] Author George Monbiot will likely NEVER come clean about global warming no matter how much evidence is presented to him as he still has books to sell.

[3] More scientists (31,487) have voluntarily signed their names to a petition denouncing the man-made global warming theory that were even on the official International Panel on Climate Change – many who signed were not even scientists. When you investigate the details, only 60 scientists actually supported the theory.  As usual the devil is in the details and politicians are good at manipulating words to hide them.

Related:

Global Warming – Scientific Fraud

INC the (nuclear power) BEAST

Peak Oil and Global Warming: Plan A and Plan B

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s