Author Archives: anticorruptionsociety

The Credit River Decision should have been a game changer!

JEROME DALY – THE MAHONEY CREDIT RIVER DECISION

Posted by 4closureFraud on December 2, 2009 

[This case should have put an end to mortgage fraud, but instead the banksters got Glass-Stegal overturned and moved into massive securitization schemes.]

_____________________________________________________

A Minnesota Trial Court’s decision holding the Federal Reserve Act unconstitutional and VOID; holding the National Banking Act unconstitutional and VOID; declaring a mortgage acquired by the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota in the regular course of its business, along with the foreclosure and the sheriff’s sale, to be VOID.

A WORD FROM AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE WHO KNEW AND WORKED WITH JUSTICE MARTIN V. MAHONEY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, ABOUT THE CASE.

The “Credit River Decision” handed down by a jury of 12 on a cold day in December, in the Credit River Township Hall, was an experience that I’ll never forget.

The Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court had phoned me a week before the trial and asked me if I would be an associate justice in assisting Justice Martin V. Mahoney since he had never handled a jury trial before. I accepted, and it took me two hours to get my car running in the 22 below zero weather.

Continue reading

The Aristocracy of our Monied Corporations

CORPORATE RIGHTS [and our communities]

From the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund

“I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”  — Thomas Jefferson, 1816

“In 1819 in Dartmouth College v. Woodward, the U.S. Supreme Court introduced a distinction between the rights of a public corporation and a private one. The U.S. Constitution’s contract clause did not protect the political powers granted in the charter of a public corporation such as a municipality. State legislatures could, therefore, unilaterally amend or revoke municipal charters and strip a city of authority without the municipality’s consent. But the charter of a private corporation, such as a business enterprise or a privately endowed college, was an inviolate grant of property rights guaranteed by the nation’s Constitution.” — Jon C. Teaford, Municipal Charters

The structure of federal and state law – both statutory and constitutional – empowers corporations to override local democratic decision making.

Since the early 1800s, corporations have gained rights and protections under the United States Constitution.  While we never find the word “corporation” in the Constitution, corporations are able to invoke constitutional “rights” and protections under the Commerce Clause and Contracts Clause, as well as under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments.

Continue reading

The County Sheriff

A BRIEF HISTORY

March 12, 2012
Donna Fike, Butler County Sheriff Brigade

The word sheriff comes from the Anglo-Saxon term, shire reeve. The following definitions are found in the 1913 Webster Dictionary.

Shire n.1.A portion of Great Britain originally under the supervision of an earl; a territorial division, usually identical with a county
Reeve  n.1.an officer, steward, bailiff, or governor; used chiefly in compounds; as, shirereeve, now written sheriff; portreeve, etc.

Sheriff n.1.The chief officer of a shire or county, to whom is intrusted the execution of the laws, the serving of judicial writs and
processes, and the preservation of the peace.

In 1856, John Bouvier published his work A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and laws of the United States  He provides us with the following definition of Sheriff:

SHERIFF. The name of the chief officer of the county. In Latin he is called vice comes, because in England he represented the comes or earl. His name is said to be derived from the Saxon seyre, shire or county, and reve, keeper, bailiff, or guardian.

The general duties of the sheriff are, 1st. To keep the peace within the county; he may apprehend, and commit to prison all persons who break the peace or attempt to break it, and bind any one in a recognizance to keep the peace. He is required ex officio, to pursue and take all traitors, murderers, felons and rioters. He has the keeping of the county gaol and he is bound to defend it against all attacks. He may command the posse comitatus. (q. v.)

The office of Sheriff is the oldest law enforcement position in the United States. “When the first counties were established in Virginia in 1634, the Office of Sheriff in America began. Maryland soon followed this pattern, and in both states the Sheriff was delegated the same powers as the Sheriff held in England. As in England, respect for the Sheriff was strictly enforced by the law. A special seat was often reserved for the Sheriff in churches. Contempt against the Sheriff was an offense punishable by whipping. At this time, Sheriffs were responsible for both enforcing and punishing offenders. By the time of the American Revolution, all of the colonies had Sheriffs.” The Sheriffs Office In History

The Sheriffs Power

Continue reading

The WTO attempts to control the food chain

THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION HAS DECIDED THAT FOOD LABELING (AND DOLPHIN PROTECTION) INTERFERES WITH THE PROFITS OF THE MEGA-CORPORATIONS!

The WTO is the local food movement’s mortal enemy!!

Here is yet one more example that globalization – and food centralization – is harmful to both the people and the animals that call this planet home. This time the WTO wishes to over-ride Congress and enforce trade ‘agreements’ that the people are not a party to.

The World Trade Organization is an unelected body that represents multi-national corporations like Monsanto and their GMO Frankenfood.

What is The World Trade Organization?

The World Trade Organization was created in 1994 as the successor organization to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and represents 146 countries in an effort to globalize commerce. All the major countries are included, China only recently and with the United States as the dominating factor. This is the world court of trade where mega-buck arguments on everything from restrictions on imports and e-commerce issues are debated and settled and rules are made. They are coming together in order to implement treaties among member nations that would liberalize and eventually eliminate tariffs and other restrictions on trade in various sectors of the world economy. It is modeled after the North American Free Trade Agreement. Those in favor of this economic one world order see it as a way to boost the world’s economy by liberalizing trade barriers. Those against the WTO sees it as an exploitative, oppressive system of world domination that takes away worker’s rights, weakening consumer and public health, despoiling the environment, enslaving workers around the world and usurping the rights of each country to make its own trade laws. It has been likened to public interest laws simply being flushed down the toilet. The beast is roaring. Each location where meetings are being held are called “rounds.” Since 1948, there have been nine rounds of global-trade talks.

Once a nation surrenders its food sovereignty, the people can easily be starved into accepting the Global Domination Agenda.

Related

Scientists under attack – GMO exposed!

___________________________________________________

Dr. Henry Kissinger (Rockefeller toady, globalist and Club of Rome member):

“Who controls the food supply controls the people;
who controls the energy can control whole continents;
who controls money can control the world.”

Oval office was (is?) in charge of the CIA drug cartel

WHEN OBAMA MADE HILLIARY HIS SECRETARY OF STATE, IT BECAME APPARENT HE WOULD NOT BE PROSECUTING “THE MENA CONNECTION: BUSH, CLINTON, AND CIA DRUG SMUGGLING”

Part 1

Continue reading