Comments on: Fraud by any other name . . . is still FRAUD

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:20:37 +0000

Massive corruption of bribes and kickbacks
Military, big oil, wallstreet, big Pharma, bailouts
Absolutely no accountability. 40 years of looting
Missing 2.3 trillion from pentagon announced Sept 10…. Google that monster

Change? Yeah, thanks….. We’ve been played… Again……. Beware another Orchestrated Terror attack…. Diversions

By: anticorruptionsociety

anticorruptionsociety — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:40:08 +0000

John Harris is not wrong. He is absolutely right. The law (statute) enforcement officer is able to arrest folks for violating corporation ‘rules’ because he has a gun, a billy stick, a taser, or whatever instrument of force the corporate statute enforcers choose to use. The law imposed by the well armed bully has always been able to subdue those who are not as well armed.

The man in the video you provided did not know how to respond to the statute enforcers . . . most folks don’t. Which is why he allowed himself to be arrested.

The history of the Corporation is actually quite interesting: http://www.astonisher.com/archives/corporation_intro.html

For those interested in exposing and opposing corruption, it is necessary to take a hard cold look at the non-living parasitic beast we know as The Corporation. It is truly a doom machine. We need a new business model so that we can honorably enter into contracts and agreements with each other while still being held personally accountable for our actions. The role the ‘corporation’ is now playing on our planet is explained in INC the BEAST.
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/02/18/inc-the-beast/

Without understanding the corporation, you cannot understand corruption. And the goal of the ‘ruling’ satanic central gangster/banksters is One World Corporation that would control monarchies and everyone else.
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/03/05/the-city-world-conquest/

Many of us believe that government is a creation of human kind, i.e. Of the People, By the People and For the People. However the banksters have been pushing relentlessly for government Of the Corporation, By the Corporation and For the Corporation. Since the corporation is merely a piece of paper sitting is a safe somewhere, since it is not alive and cannot make a committment to living things, rule by the corporation will end badly for all life on our planet. This is why it must be understand and replaced with something better.

Best,
AL

By: AnnoLoki

AnnoLoki — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:31:28 +0000

I am aware of John Harris’ work, and he is also very wrong about this. You are correct that an individual doesn’t need encorporating for the purposes of credit and trade, but you do need to be a person to hold a bank account, and that means either a natural person (backed by a human body) or a legal person (backed by a corpus encorporated under Corporate Law). As we do not wish for our politicians to personally hold the bank accounts of the state, we instead create a legal entity to hold those bank accounts which the politicians then “direct”. I’m not making this up, this is a real thing that completely makes sense to anybody who’s not deliberately twisting the truth in the way Harris does because it sounds “cooler” that way. It doesn’t matter what you “recognise”, it’s not up to you, the universe doesn’t bend to your understanding of it, which is a good job because you completely contract your own argument. The monarch has real power that which it deligates to Her Majesty’s Government, if it *didn’t* have real power, then Corporate Law couldn’t be real! They couldn’t have corporate entities under that law! If you accept that they are corporations, and you accept that corporations are legal entities, you must accept that somebody must have created the legal framework which corporates can exist within. A corporation cannot go back in time to create the legal framework for its own existence, that’s a ridiculous thing to suggest. So if they didn’t go back in time to create the law, there must have been an existing authority which did. That authority exists and has power because of it’s use of force to enforce that authority, it doesn’t matter whether you think it’s “fair” or whether you “recognise” it, the Monarch exists where it does still exist because it hasn’t been sufficiently challenged with a greater force. In USA it was challenged, which is why the Monarch no longer rules over there.

You’re arguing something that just isn’t true, as is Harris. You can pretend it’s true and live in this fairyland where your views of what’s fair matter enough to physically change reality, where you can throw up your arms and declare “I’m not playing”, but this isn’t a game, it’s real life, the rules don’t change just because you don’t like them. Wanna see what happens when somebody tries to assert what Harris has taught them on the world? Here ya go:

The guy’s gets himself arrested! This is real life observation of reality, it doesn’t match up with what Harris says, his ideas aren’t true, they don’t work, it’s a fairytale. You shouldn’t believe something just because “some guy on youtube” told it you. Think about it logically, look at the evidence, interact with the world. You’ll soon see that this “they’re just a corporation” is a serious abuse of the word ‘just’.

By: anticorruptionsociety

anticorruptionsociety — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:18:35 +0000

The banksters and the barristers have conditioned many to believe this statement:
“Having a registered corporation to enable trade and financing”
but it is not true, you don’t have to have a registered corporation to do business.

The history of the ‘corporation’ goes back to the pope.

I do not recognize the ‘divine right of kings’ – never have never will. They are merely a group of inbred rich folks who have successfully robbed, cheated and stole from the rest of us for a very long time. In fact, they have inbred so long, the argument can easliy be made that most of them are now psychopaths.

In England there is much recogniztion that King John signed over your country and all of its lands and people to the Pope in 1213 and that the Pope voided the Magna Carta.
http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/926293

Sooo, these discussions can go on for a very long time. Many scholars have researched history and disclosed lots of inconsistancies as well.

In the United States and Britain almost all municipalities, government agencies, public schools and even libraries are listed a ‘businesses’ on Dun and Bradstreet. Those working for these entities are NOT public servants and do NOT serve the public. They serve the corporation they work for.

John Harris did a great video describing what is going on in Britain. In fact John Harris has woken up many across the planet. It is a great place to start understanding the difference between the artificially created corporate entity and the flesh and blood human.
http://www.tpuc.org/node/558

Best,
AL

By: AnnoLoki

AnnoLoki — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:33:40 +0000

That’s irrelevant to my point. Having a registered corporation to enable trade and financing does not mean that nothing else exists. The government backs a corporate entity, but it’s foolish to suggest a country is not a country, but just a corporation, because corporations are persons under corporate law, but for that corporate law to exist, there must be an authority for it to exist under. In the case of Britain, it exists under statute which is created by Royal Ascent, which is a greater thing than merely a corporate memo, think about it logically, a corporation couldn’t have formed corporate law because it couldn’t've existed as a corporation to create itself as a corporation before corporate law therefore corporations existed! Therefore, something existed first that allowed the creation of corporations (ie, the monarch and government). Once corporate law is created, those previous entities can, after that point, back corporate entities. But they don’t go out of existence at that point, they continue to exist as what they were before they created corporate entities. That predated existence is where the power comes from, not from the fact that it is a corporation, but the fact that they’re the freakin Monarchy. The two aren’t mutually exclusive qualities.