Fraud by any other name . . . is still FRAUD

WE CAN’T FIX WASHINGTON – #1

by AL Whitney (C) copyright 2010
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and AntiCorruptionSociety acknowledged

“The United States has been under dictatorial control since March 9, 1933″

To the Tea Party Movement and all others who have figured out our government does not appear to be representing us . . .

Not only is our government not serving us, it has become extremely predatory. 

Did you know that a for-profit corporate prison system has been established and a greater percentage of our population is imprisoned than any other country on the planet – including China?

 

Did you know Congress granted the Department of Defense the ‘authority’ to do biological experiments on the general population – without our knowledge or permission?

The Secretary of Defense [may] conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological [warfare] agents on civilian populations [within the United States].” -SOURCE- Public Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 91, page 334, you will find Public Law 95-79. Public Law 97-375, title II, Sec. 203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1882. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 96, page 1882, you will find Public Law 97-375

All this might shock and surprise many, but in the United States, we live in a legal duality.  The U.S. Constitution, so frequently sited by freedom advocates and those in the Tea Party movement, is currently just a paper fantasy to law enforcement and those running our judicial system.  The United States isn’t a country it is a corporation and the standing president (Obama) is its CEO, which accounts for all of the ‘Executive Orders’, ‘Presidental Directives’, and ‘Signing Statements’. The same is true in many (most?) countries, such as England and Australia.

Here is a brief list describing what has happened to our legal system. These events/changes took place over many years.

HORSE’S MOUTH CONFESSIONS
(can be reviewed in less than 30 minutes).
Please Goggle or use the included links:

- “28 USC 3002” (definition of the United States as a Federal corporation never taught in civics class; go to paragraph 15) ( http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002—-000-.html )

- “27 CFR 72.11” (U.S. Inc. defines all crime as commercial as a result of the fall of the republic when the South walked out of congress in 1861 and the de jure congress, unable to raise a quorum, was replaced by Lincoln with the de facto corporate Congress; and the de jure district court of the United States was replaced by the de facto corporate UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ( http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_98/27cfr72_98.html)

- “Executive Order 6102” (government’s confiscation of your family’s gold and wealth under threat of 10 years in prison for failure to comply. As the Order specifies U.S. “persons” (eg. JOHN SMITH and JANE DOE), law enforcement was duped into enforcing against the general public a command that only applied to Federal employees and members of the armed forces.) ( http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611 or http://www.the-privateer.com/1933-gold-confiscation.html)

- “HJR 192” (outlawing of the simple act of “paying with money” as a felony by substituting the lawyer’s parlor trick of “discharging” debts) ( http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/HJR192.htm or http://www.nomoredebt.cc/hjr192.html)

- “Congressman Louis McFadden speech” (indictment of the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board of Governor’s for treason by the chairman of the House Banking and Currency committee in 1934. In scathing speeches to Congress, McFadden said: “(The Fed) has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government.” This most knowledgeable man on banking also explained in vivid detail the method for recruiting the Federal Reserve to pay our debts as holder of the gold, and which is at the heart of today’s “tax remedies.”) ( http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/mcfadden-frb.html or http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/flaherty10.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_T._McFadden)

- “Lewis v. United States 680” (Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned: “…we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act), but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.” Lewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982). In other words, the Fed enjoys no United States immunity from law suit because it is a Federal institution in name only. ( http://nesara.org/court_summaries/lewis_v_united_states.htm and http://www.geocities.com/chrisforliberty/lewis.html)

- “Modern Money Mechanics” (The Fed’s concise operational manual showing how money AND INTENTIONAL INFLATION are created from thin air by the Fed and it’s member banks. The manual is very clear as to the power of created inflation to speed the process of confiscating your wealth. The section: “Who Creates Money?” and the final paragraph in “Bank Deposits – How They Expand or Contract” are worth extra attention.) ( www.rayservers.com/images/ModernMoneyMechanics.pdf or http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Modern_Money_Mechanics/Introduction )

- “Grace Commission” (Confirmed that virtually ALL taxes actually go to the Federal Reserve Bank to pay interest on the U.S. debt to the banking families that own the International Monetary Fund (IMF): “With two-thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.” J. Peter Grace, Cover letter, President’s Private Sector Report on Cost Control, January 12, 1984. Peter Grace was considered the Warren Buffett of his time, and the Grace Commission Report received widespread media attention as the gospel of Reagan’s so-called tax system overhaul.) ( http://www.freecanadian.net/articles/grace.html or http://www.uhuh.com/taxstuff/gracecom.htm)

- “31 CFR 103.11” (Promissory note is defined as a “monetary instrument:” “(u) Monetary instruments…Monetary instruments include…All negotiable instruments (including personal checks, business checks, official bank checks, cashier’s checks, third-party checks, promissory notes (as that term is defined in the Uniform Commercial Code), and money orders) that are either in bearer form, endorsed without restriction, made out to a fictitious payee (for the purposes of Sec. 103.23), or otherwise in such form that title thereto passes upon delivery.”) ( http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2008/julqtr/31cfr103.11.htm or http://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/regulations/31CFR103.htm )

- “NYUCC 3-104” (Promissory note is defined as a “negotiable instrument:” “(1) Any writing to be a negotiable instrument within this Article must (a) be signed by the maker or drawer; and (b) contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money and no other promise, order, obligation or power given by the maker or drawer except as authorized by this Article; and (c) be payable on demand or at a definite time; and (d) be payable to order or to bearer. (2) A writing which complies with the requirements of this section is (a) a “draft” (“bill of exchange”) if it is an order; (b) a “check” if it is a draft drawn on a bank and payable on demand; (c) a “certificate of deposit” if it is an acknowledgment by a bank of receipt of money with an engagement to repay it; (d) a “note” if it is a promise other than a certificate of deposit.) ( www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104.html)

- “Senate Report 93-549” (The United States has been under dictatorial control since March 9, 1933. Report of the Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency, Senate Report 93-549, War and Emergency Powers Acts, November 19, 1973. “Foreward: Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal Constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”) ( http://www.scratchinpost.net/barefootbob/war_ep1.html)

- “Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949).” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “It is a well established principle of law that all federal regulation applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States unless a contrary intent appears.”)

- “Caha v. US, 152 U.S. 211 (1894)” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “The laws of Congress in respect to those matters [outside of Constitutionally delegated powers] do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.”)

- “U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222.” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “There is a canon of legislative construction which teaches Congress that, unless a contrary intent appears [legislation] is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”)

- “Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).” (Purportedly decided if the constitution applies to U.S. territories. In actuality, unleashed the great fraud of unlimited statutory power misapplied throughout the continental united States of America. Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan. “…two national governments, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to…a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will result…We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism…It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence.” In other words, a genuine de jure united States of America congress is always bound to enact laws within the jurisdiction of the constitution. He held tyo the obvious truth that congress does not exist, let alone have powers, outside the constitution. Harlan said, “This nation is under the control of a written constitution, the supreme law of the land and the only source of the powers which our government, or any branch or officer of it, may exert at any time or at any place.”)

- Section 802, Patriot Act. (Defining the People as terrorists. Defining terrorism as a maritime event. Excluding private meetings on the land from terrorism: “(5) the term `domestic terrorism’ means activities that–(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended– (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”) ( http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Section802.html)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

For those who have doubts about these facts, google your city, county, school district, or state public health department on Dun and Bradstreet. If it is listed, it is a corporation.

The restoration of our Constitutional Republic can’t be achieved without

UNICORPORATING OUR GOVERNMENT

AND ALL OF THE AGENCIES (and schools)

THAT HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THIS

NEFARIOUS SCAM AGAINST THE PUBLIC.

 Ongoing efforts to achieve that goal:

DALE Vs UNITED STATES

The crime this duality represents, and that has been committed against the population of the United States, is called: Fraudulent Concealment
“The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

Related:

Our Government is a Company

Inc. the BEAST

Preditory Public Health

About these ads

8 responses to “Fraud by any other name . . . is still FRAUD

  1. Massive corruption of bribes and kickbacks
    Military, big oil, wallstreet, big Pharma, bailouts
    Absolutely no accountability. 40 years of looting
    Missing 2.3 trillion from pentagon announced Sept 10…. Google that monster

    Change? Yeah, thanks….. We’ve been played… Again……. Beware another Orchestrated Terror attack…. Diversions

  2. The banksters and the barristers have conditioned many to believe this statement:
    “Having a registered corporation to enable trade and financing”
    but it is not true, you don’t have to have a registered corporation to do business.

    The history of the ‘corporation’ goes back to the pope.

    I do not recognize the ‘divine right of kings’ – never have never will. They are merely a group of inbred rich folks who have successfully robbed, cheated and stole from the rest of us for a very long time. In fact, they have inbred so long, the argument can easliy be made that most of them are now psychopaths.

    In England there is much recogniztion that King John signed over your country and all of its lands and people to the Pope in 1213 and that the Pope voided the Magna Carta.

    http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/926293

    Sooo, these discussions can go on for a very long time. Many scholars have researched history and disclosed lots of inconsistancies as well.

    In the United States and Britain almost all municipalities, government agencies, public schools and even libraries are listed a ‘businesses’ on Dun and Bradstreet. Those working for these entities are NOT public servants and do NOT serve the public. They serve the corporation they work for.

    John Harris did a great video describing what is going on in Britain. In fact John Harris has woken up many across the planet. It is a great place to start understanding the difference between the artificially created corporate entity and the flesh and blood human.

    http://www.tpuc.org/node/558

    Best,
    AL

    • I am aware of John Harris’ work, and he is also very wrong about this. You are correct that an individual doesn’t need encorporating for the purposes of credit and trade, but you do need to be a person to hold a bank account, and that means either a natural person (backed by a human body) or a legal person (backed by a corpus encorporated under Corporate Law). As we do not wish for our politicians to personally hold the bank accounts of the state, we instead create a legal entity to hold those bank accounts which the politicians then “direct”. I’m not making this up, this is a real thing that completely makes sense to anybody who’s not deliberately twisting the truth in the way Harris does because it sounds “cooler” that way. It doesn’t matter what you “recognise”, it’s not up to you, the universe doesn’t bend to your understanding of it, which is a good job because you completely contract your own argument. The monarch has real power that which it deligates to Her Majesty’s Government, if it *didn’t* have real power, then Corporate Law couldn’t be real! They couldn’t have corporate entities under that law! If you accept that they are corporations, and you accept that corporations are legal entities, you must accept that somebody must have created the legal framework which corporates can exist within. A corporation cannot go back in time to create the legal framework for its own existence, that’s a ridiculous thing to suggest. So if they didn’t go back in time to create the law, there must have been an existing authority which did. That authority exists and has power because of it’s use of force to enforce that authority, it doesn’t matter whether you think it’s “fair” or whether you “recognise” it, the Monarch exists where it does still exist because it hasn’t been sufficiently challenged with a greater force. In USA it was challenged, which is why the Monarch no longer rules over there.

      You’re arguing something that just isn’t true, as is Harris. You can pretend it’s true and live in this fairyland where your views of what’s fair matter enough to physically change reality, where you can throw up your arms and declare “I’m not playing”, but this isn’t a game, it’s real life, the rules don’t change just because you don’t like them. Wanna see what happens when somebody tries to assert what Harris has taught them on the world? Here ya go:

      The guy’s gets himself arrested! This is real life observation of reality, it doesn’t match up with what Harris says, his ideas aren’t true, they don’t work, it’s a fairytale. You shouldn’t believe something just because “some guy on youtube” told it you. Think about it logically, look at the evidence, interact with the world. You’ll soon see that this “they’re just a corporation” is a serious abuse of the word ‘just’.

      • John Harris is not wrong. He is absolutely right. The law (statute) enforcement officer is able to arrest folks for violating corporation ‘rules’ because he has a gun, a billy stick, a taser, or whatever instrument of force the corporate statute enforcers choose to use. The law imposed by the well armed bully has always been able to subdue those who are not as well armed.

        The man in the video you provided did not know how to respond to the statute enforcers . . . most folks don’t. Which is why he allowed himself to be arrested.

        The history of the Corporation is actually quite interesting: http://www.astonisher.com/archives/corporation_intro.html

        For those interested in exposing and opposing corruption, it is necessary to take a hard cold look at the non-living parasitic beast we know as The Corporation. It is truly a doom machine. We need a new business model so that we can honorably enter into contracts and agreements with each other while still being held personally accountable for our actions. The role the ‘corporation’ is now playing on our planet is explained in INC the BEAST.

        http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/02/18/inc-the-beast/

        Without understanding the corporation, you cannot understand corruption. And the goal of the ‘ruling’ satanic central gangster/banksters is One World Corporation that would control monarchies and everyone else.

        http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/03/05/the-city-world-conquest/

        Many of us believe that government is a creation of human kind, i.e. Of the People, By the People and For the People. However the banksters have been pushing relentlessly for government Of the Corporation, By the Corporation and For the Corporation. Since the corporation is merely a piece of paper sitting is a safe somewhere, since it is not alive and cannot make a committment to living things, rule by the corporation will end badly for all life on our planet. This is why it must be understand and replaced with something better.

        Best,
        AL

  3. That’s irrelevant to my point. Having a registered corporation to enable trade and financing does not mean that nothing else exists. The government backs a corporate entity, but it’s foolish to suggest a country is not a country, but just a corporation, because corporations are persons under corporate law, but for that corporate law to exist, there must be an authority for it to exist under. In the case of Britain, it exists under statute which is created by Royal Ascent, which is a greater thing than merely a corporate memo, think about it logically, a corporation couldn’t have formed corporate law because it couldn’t’ve existed as a corporation to create itself as a corporation before corporate law therefore corporations existed! Therefore, something existed first that allowed the creation of corporations (ie, the monarch and government). Once corporate law is created, those previous entities can, after that point, back corporate entities. But they don’t go out of existence at that point, they continue to exist as what they were before they created corporate entities. That predated existence is where the power comes from, not from the fact that it is a corporation, but the fact that they’re the freakin Monarchy. The two aren’t mutually exclusive qualities.

  4. “The United States isn’t a country it is a corporation [...] The same is true in many (most?) countries, such as England”

    Well I can only knowledgeable speak for England, but that is certainly not true here, although it is a common misconception. The government is registered as a corporation for the purpose of trade etc. Only a “person” can hold a bank account, so the choice is to either allow politicians etc to hold many that’s not theirs in their own personal bank accounts, OR to allow the creation of “non-natural persons” (legal entities that are not backed by a human body) called companies/corporations. So, the government has a registered corporation to hold its bank accounts, but this does not mean it is defined by that fact. It is _Her_Magesty’s_Government_, it rules by Royal Ascent, which makes it different to any other corpus that backs a corporate entity. I would imagine that other countries under the Queen, like Canada and Australia, are the same.

    • TheMoneyMasters are in charge, no matter how you look at it. TheMoneyMasters are indeed masters at ‘fraud’.

      Queen Elizabeth fronts for Rothschilds (“Crown”)

      http://www.henrymakow.com/by_alcuin_bramertonfor_henryma.html

      I”t is accurate to posit that Australia, New Zealand and Canada are not independent, sovereign countries. However, these nations are not owned and run by the UK; they are owned and run by the House of Windsor Crown Temple syndicate within the City of London Corporation. The head signatory of the Crown Temple syndicate is Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England).

      It should not be forgotten that the most powerful financial syndicate in the Western World is that of the European Rothschilds. The Rothschilds, because of their power base inside the City of London Corporation, have a controlling membership of the London Crown Temple syndicate, and they also have executive control of the Vatican and the Mafia though the P2 Masonic Lodge in Italy.”

      And their goal is One World Earth Corporation.

      http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/03/05/the-city-world-conquest/

      And The Rothschilds have comitted more heinous acts in pursuit of this goal than any other family in history.

      http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/08/13/if-you-wanted-to-rob-cheat-and-steal/

  5. what has happened to HJR-192 has it been codified or has it been made into to a Statue

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s