Retired pharmacist blows the whistle on vaccine mandates and profiteers

PROFITS, NOT SCIENCE, MOTIVATE VACCINE MANDATES

[Reprint from Wellbeing Journal, Spring 2001]
By Kristine M. Severyn, Ph.D. (Dayton, Ohio)

vaccines - children runningThe Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of individuals hand-picked by members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), recommends which vaccines are administered to American children. Working mainly in secret, ACIP members frequently have financial links to vaccine manufacturers. Dependent on federal CDC funding, administrators of state vaccination programs follow CDC directives by influencing state legislators to mandate new vaccines. Federal vaccine funds can be denied to states that do not “vigorously enforce” mandatory vaccination laws.

Conversely, the CDC offers financial bounties to state departments of health for each “fully vaccinated” child. In a recent year, the Ohio Department of Health received $1 million in such CDC bonus payments.

At CDC national immunization conferences, Merck and other vaccine manufacturers wine and dine thousands of attendees who make their living promoting and administering vaccines.

Are physicians beholden?
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), a major supporter of mandatory chicken pox and other vaccine mandates across the country, shares incestuous financial ties with Merck. When constructing its new headquarters in suburban Chicago, the AAP solicited funds from Merck, and received $100,000 for its building campaign.

Vaccines represent an economic boon for pediatricians. Profitable well-baby visits are timed to coincide with vaccination schedules established by the AAP and the CDC. Continue reading

Re-framing the Vaccine Debate

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

Doctor Does Injection Child Vaccination BabyOne thing is true for sure, what the vaccine aware movement has been doing up to now has not solved the problem. We did not successfully nullify the herd immunity myth or discredit the CDC; we did not stop the move to eliminate all vaccine exemptions; and we were unable to prevent folks from  being coerced into accepting vaccines to keep their jobs.

The drug industry, their partners in so-called government and the media currently control the debate regarding vaccine efficacy and safety. This is why the vaccine zealot (bullshitter*) Paul Offit is always invited to be the pro-vaccine spokesman and restrict the vaccine debate. So far, those who know that vaccines are neither safe NOR effective have been unwilling and/or unable to re-frame this debate – with some admirable exceptions. This stalemate has been ongoing for decades. In fact according to reports coming in, physicians are now being threatened with the loss of the licenses if they speak against vaccines. The intention is to remove knowledgeable physicians from the debate completely.

This has happened before. Dentists who exposed the truth regarding mercury (amalgam) fillings were harassed if they mentioned the word “mercury” in public. Scientists who tried to expose water fluoridation (like Dr. Yiamouyiannis) were fired and defamed. And research funding is unavailable to scientists who wish to study and report on the toxicity of Roundup. The fact is that the entire chemical industry has enjoyed nearly a century of unimpeded malignant growth. Both physicians and dentists are taught very little toxicology in school, by design. The reason goes all the way back to Rockefeller’s establishment of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). None of the so-called government agencies protect the public from the chemical/pharmaceutical industries. They were never meant to. They were established to give both the petrochemical and pharmaceutical industries cover and plausible deniability. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZcUd3V8L30

We all have an inalienable right – and obligation – to refuse to be poisoned. The vaccination debate is not about religion, as attorney Alan Phillips falsely touts. Keeping the debate about religious conviction (or choice) sets up a battle between parents who unwittingly permit their children to be poisoned and those that are smart enough to say no. The battle really is about our ability to refuse to be injected with toxic substances. Unless we find the courage to re-frame the debate exposing the truth, we will lose and will all be facing lives of poor health and premature death. (See Dr Andrew Moulden’s Vaccine Injuries presentation)

Sorry to be so blunt, but no one can afford to remain naive. Veteran medical researcher and journalist Jon Rappoport explains what the vaccine aware community needs to do to try to stave off what is growing into a medical tyranny (recently exposed by Dr Tenpenny on InfoWars) that will affect us all.
10 min audio clip from Rappoport interview on Red Ice Radio on Feb 18, 2015

Continue reading

Harvard Scientists Warn about Epidemic of Side Effects Due to Corruption

nsnbc international
February 10, 2014

drugsA recent study about institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals and the myth of safe and effective drugs, warns that over the past 35 years, patients have suffered from a largely hidden epidemic of side effects from drugs that usually have few, offsetting benefits.

The study, published in the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics,* conducted by Light, Lexchin and Darrow, warns that the pharmaceutical industry has corrupted the practice of medicine through its influence over what drugs are developed, how they are tested, and how medical knowledge is created.

The researchers warn that since 1906, commercial influence has compromised Congressional legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs, adding that the authorization of user fees in 1992 has turned drug companies into the FDA’s prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency.

Part of the regulatory and cultural capture of the FDA has enabled the industry to successfully demand shorter average review times. Less time to thoroughly review the evidence, warn the researchers, has led to increased hospitalization and death.

The researchers warn that meeting the needs of the drug companies has taken priority over meeting the needs of the patients, adding that unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate.

Light, Lexchin and Darrow offer practical suggestions, including; separating the funding of clinical trials from their conduct, analysis, and publication; independent FDA leadership; full public funding for all FDA activities; measures to discourage research and development on drugs with few if any clinical benefits; and the creation of a National Drug Safety Board.

* “Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs” Donald W. Light, Joel Lexchin, and Jonathan Darrow. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics – Fall 2013

Why is mainstream media targeting vaccine-aware parents?

Originally posted on Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines:

THE MEDIA IS NOW ENGAGED IN A WITCH HUNT!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

witchhuntRecently the mainstream media began reporting a measles outbreak that supposedly started in California. Following this outbreak, stories about mandating vaccines have been released like the plague. Parents who do not vaccinate their children are now being targeted in what appears to be a witch hunt. On Jan 28, 2015, Alex Berezow, a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors, even wrote; “Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to jail.”

Why is this happening?

A growing number of men and women in America have recognized that our country has become a corporatocracy. That is, big corporations (be they military or medical) have the power to insure policies are put in place that benefit them economically –…

View original 516 more words

Lies, Damned Lies and Medical Science

MUCH OF WHAT MEDICAL RESEARCHERS CONCLUDE IN THEIR STUDIES IS MISLEADING, EXAGGERATED OR FLAT-OUT WRONG!

David Freedman, The Atlantic.com
10-4-10

ioannidis

Dr John Ioannidis

So why are doctors—to a striking extent—still drawing upon misinformation in their everyday practice? Dr. John Ioannidis has spent his career challenging his peers by exposing their bad science.

Excerpts:

Indeed, given the breadth of the potential problems raised at the meeting, can any medical-research studies be trusted?

That question has been central to Ioannidis’s career. He’s what’s known as a meta-researcher, and he’s become one of the world’s foremost experts on the credibility of medical research. He and his team have shown, again and again, and in many different ways, that much of what biomedical researchers conclude in published studies—conclusions that doctors keep in mind when they prescribe antibiotics or blood-pressure medication, or when they advise us to consume more fiber or less meat, or when they recommend surgery for heart disease or back pain—is misleading, exaggerated, and often flat-out wrong. He charges that as much as 90 percent of the published medical information that doctors rely on is flawed. His work has been widely accepted by the medical community; it has been published in the field’s top journals, where it is heavily cited; and he is a big draw at conferences. Given this exposure, and the fact that his work broadly targets everyone else’s work in medicine, as well as everything that physicians do and all the health advice we get, Ioannidis may be one of the most influential scientists alive. Yet for all his influence, he worries that the field of medical research is so pervasively flawed, and so riddled with conflicts of interest, that it might be chronically resistant to change—or even to publicly admitting that there’s a problem.

“I assumed that everything we physicians did was basically right, but now I was going to help verify it,” he says. “All we’d have to do was systematically review the evidence, trust what it told us, and then everything would be perfect.”

It didn’t turn out that way. In poring over medical journals, he was struck by how many findings of all types were refuted by later findings. Of course, medical-science “never minds” are hardly secret. And they sometimes make headlines, as when in recent years large studies or growing consensuses of researchers concluded that mammograms, colonoscopies, and PSA tests are far less useful cancer-detection tools than we had been told; or when widely prescribed antidepressants such as Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil were revealed to be no more effective than a placebo for most cases of depression; or when we learned that staying out of the sun entirely can actually increase cancer risks; or when we were told that the advice to drink lots of water during intense exercise was potentially fatal; or when, last April, we were informed that taking fish oil, exercising, and doing puzzles doesn’t really help fend off Alzheimer’s disease, as long claimed. Peer-reviewed studies have come to opposite conclusions on whether using cell phones can cause brain cancer, whether sleeping more than eight hours a night is healthful or dangerous, whether taking aspirin every day is more likely to save your life or cut it short, and whether routine angioplasty works better than pills to unclog heart arteries. Continue reading

Taking down USA INC could save America from a petro-dollar collapse!

INTERNATIONAL LAW ATTORNEY ALFRED WEBRE EXPLAINS HOW THE US COULD PREVENT ECONOMIC COLLAPSE BY RESTORING THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged.

Alfred Lambremont Webre, a graduate of Yale University and Yale Law School is a former Fulbright Scholar. He taught at Yale University and the University of Texas, was general Counsel for the NYC EPA, and was an NGO delegate to the United Nations. Webre also served as an International Judge on the Kuala Lampur War Crimes Tribunal, that on May 11, 2012 found George Bush, Richard Cheney et. al. guilty of war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Alfred Webre is also part of a global network of researchers that have been monitoring both the global economy and the growth of human rights violations (atrocities) for many years. He has exposed depleted uranium poisoning, toxic vaccines, chemtrails, electromagentic radiation, and the entire depopulation/transhumanism agenda. He reports his research regularly on his news web site: http://newsinsideout.com/

In a recent interview Webre explained that the perpetrators of these crimes against humanity are using the military industrial complex of the UNITED STATES corporation and their bankster’s control of the world’s reserve currency (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE) to wreak havoc across the planet. According to Alfred Webre, if the American people restore the original United States Constitution, our country will be able to dump the private currency we are currently forced to use (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE) and replace it with the new gold-backed money system currently being established by the BRICS.  Such a change would free the American people from the parasitic private FEDERAL RESERVE and bring an end to their “slavery by currency“. The entire interview can be accessed here.

Alfred Webre has also drawn attention to a solution to the BRICS/USA INC dilemma in his article about the 2016 presidential election.

NOTE: Attorney Webre has endorsed the AntiCorruptionSociety’s guide LAWFULLY YOURS and instructed all Americans to challenge the unlawful authority of the UNITED STATES corporation whenever possible, which is the sole purpose of the LAWFULLY YOURS People’s Empowerment Guide.

Health Hazards of Disease Prevention

BSEM March 2011
(British Society for Ecological Medicine)

vaccines - children runningThe vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds?

 

Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD
Neural Dynamics Research Group, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, 828 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L8, lucijat77@gmail.com

INTRODUCTION

No pharmaceutical drug is devoid of risks from adverse reactions and vaccines are no exception. According to the world’s leading drug regulatory authority, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), vaccines represent a special category of drugs in that they are generally given to healthy individuals and often to prevent a disease to which an individual may never be exposed [1]. This, according to the FDA, places extra emphasis on vaccine safety. Universally, regulatory authorities are responsible for ensuring that new vaccines go through proper scientific evaluation before they are approved. An equal responsibility rests on the medical profession to promote vaccinations but only with those vaccines whose safety and efficacy has been demonstrated to be statistically significant. Furthermore, vaccination is a medical intervention and as such, it should be carried out with the full consent of those who are being subjected to it. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable risks and benefits and, where applicable, a description of alternative courses of treatment. In cases where children and infants are involved, full consent with regards to vaccination should be given by the parents.

Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.

Continue reading

Vaccinating the ‘herd’

Lawrence Solomon, Consumer Policy Institute
June 14, 2014

Mass vaccination advocates rely on ‘herd immunity’ to make their case. But it doesn’t exist!

vaccine1“When vaccination rates are very high, as they still are in the nation as a whole, everyone is protected,” explained USA Today in a recent editorial entitled “Vaccine opt-outs put public health at risk.”

“This ‘herd immunity’ protects the most vulnerable, including those who can’t be vaccinated for medical reasons, infants too young to get vaccinated and people on whom the vaccine doesn’t work. But herd immunity works only when nearly the whole herd hoins in. When some refuse vaccinations and seek a free ride, immunity breaks down and everyone is more vulnerable.”

The concept of “herd immunity” first materialized in the 1930s, when Johns Hopkins University’s Arthur Hedrich discovered that, after 55% of Baltimore’s population acquired measles (and thus immunity to measles), the rest of the population, or “herd” became protected. This concept provides today’s rationale for insisting that everyone be vaccinated.

Measles outbreaks occur even when the vaccinated population exceeds 95% Continue reading

Mainstream maintains the CDC propaganda machine

In a laughable attempt to recover credibility – while the truth keeps leaking out – the propagandists have come up with a new strategy: just tell it like it is [ISN’T] . . . and remind folks to get their flu shots!

Oh, and “trust your leaders”! Sure, the same ones that covered up the JFK murder, the Gulf of Tompkin, the demolition of Building 7 on 9/11 and the non-existent “weapons of mass destruction”.

Folks will never find the truth coming out of either the mainstream media OR the criminal Center for Disease Control.

And just exactly what have our ‘leaders’ done for us to make them trustworthy? Judge Dale, retired, put it succinctly in his The Great American Adventure:

“Look around you and look at your lives! They have eliminated the family farms and local stores; placed us into cities; gave our industry away to break the unions; issued valueless currency and stole our gold and silver; raised taxes and stole their paper currency back; involved us in staged wars; began a mass foreclosure of American homes and poisoned our air and public water!”

. . . not to mention turn a sovereign country into a foreign owned corporation thus removing the lawful organic Constitution and Bill of Rights and replacing them with the Uniform ‘Commercial’ Code – without bothering to tell the American people about any of it! See: Who is Running America

EPA-CDC Whistleblower exposes their corruption of science

WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW CAN AND IS HURTING YOU!

Roger Landry, The Liberty Beacon.com
Guest: EPA/CDC whistleblower Dr David Lewis, author of Science for Sale
June 24, 2014

science for saleWhat follows is EASILY the most important discussion I have EVER had for The Liberty Beacon Special program. If this recorded discussion does not scare the hell out of you, make you insanely angry with good reason and fully awaken you to what many of us  have long suspected … You need to check yourself for a pulse.

Dr. David Lewis is an internationally recognized research microbiologist whose work in public health and environmental issues as a senior-level Research Microbiologist in EPA’s Office of Research & Development, and member of the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia has been reported in numerous news articles and documentaries from Time Magazine and Reader’s Digest to National Geographic. He is the only EPA scientist to publish first-authored articles in Nature, Lancet, and Nature Medicine.

Dr. David Lewis  worked with the EPA and CDC for 30 years plus. He explains in shocking detail why Americans have fallen from one of the healthiest to the sickest society on this planet in a few short generations, our health and that of our children literally sold out from under us for the proverbial 30 pieces of silver …

Listen as he describes the fall of these agencies from beneficial science to abject cronyism and corruption, knowingly putting the lives of millions of Americans in jeopardy. Listen as he describes policy morphing from good beneficial science to scientific data intentionally altered and falsified, only to the benefit of powerful corporations and government policies. Continue reading

Why is mainstream media targeting vaccine-aware parents?

Why is mainstream media targeting vaccine-aware parents?.